Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TSLX vs FSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
TSLX vs FSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $3.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $360M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41.18B | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 53.5% | 49.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 6.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.74B | $7.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $181M |
TSLX vs FSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sixth Street Specia… (TSLX) | 100 | 97.2 | -2.8% |
| FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSLX vs FSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.1%
- 142.2% 10Y total return vs FSK's 11.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.11x
FSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth -98.1%
- 5.5% NII/revenue growth vs TSLX's 0.1%
- Lower P/E (6.4x vs 9.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% NII/revenue growth vs TSLX's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 9.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FSK's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs FSK's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 25.6% yield, vs TSLX's 10.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.7% vs FSK's -30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FSK's 0.2% |
TSLX vs FSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 3.3x TSLX's $360M. TSLX is the more profitable business, keeping 47.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSK's 0.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $360M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $192M | $237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41.2B | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23.2B | $1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +49.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -169.2% | -178.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FSK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, TSLX trades at a 96% valuation discount to FSK's 278.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSK's 13.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSLX's 14.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.88x | 278.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.08x | 6.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.90x | 13.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.72x | 2.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.42x | 5.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLX delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $0 for FSK. TSLX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FSK's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLX scores 6/9 vs FSK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $7.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $181M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $7.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.46x | 0.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLX five years ago would be worth $12,868 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,631 for FSK. Over the past 12 months, TSLX leads with a -4.7% total return vs FSK's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLX at 9.6% vs FSK's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.7% | -30.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.8% | +1.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.2% | +11.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TSLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TSLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSK's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLX currently trades 71.0% from its 52-week high vs FSK's 48.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.17 | $22.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.99 | $9.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 985K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TSLX and FSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TSLX as "Buy" and FSK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for FSK (target: $17) vs 11.9% for TSLX (target: $20). For income investors, FSK offers the higher dividend yield at 25.59% vs TSLX's 10.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $16.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.1% | +25.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | $2.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TSLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FSK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TSLX vs FSK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSLX or FSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FS KKR Capital Corp.
(FSK) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSLX or FSK?
On trailing P/E, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
(TSLX) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus FS KKR Capital Corp. at 278. 4x. On forward P/E, FS KKR Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSLX or FSK?
Over the past 5 years, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
(TSLX) delivered a total return of +28. 7%, compared to +16. 3% for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLX returned +142. 2% versus FSK's +11. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSLX or FSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
(TSLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus FS KKR Capital Corp. 's 0. 87β — meaning FSK is approximately 38% more volatile than TSLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 131% for FS KKR Capital Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSLX or FSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FS KKR Capital Corp.
(FSK) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus 0. 1% for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. grew EPS -10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -98. 1% for FS KKR Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSLX or FSK?
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
(TSLX) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 3% net margin versus 0. 9% for FS KKR Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 47. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLX leads at 53. 5% versus 49. 5% for FSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLX leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSLX or FSK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FS KKR Capital Corp.
(FSK) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 9. 1x for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSK: 50. 8% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSLX or FSK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) offers the highest yield at 25. 6%, versus 10. 1% for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX).
09Is TSLX or FSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
(TSLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 10. 1% yield, +142. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSLX: +142. 2%, FSK: +11. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSLX and FSK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSLX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FSK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.