Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TTAN vs PCTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
TTAN vs PCTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $5.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $943M | $1.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41.86B | $258M |
| Gross Margin | 69.9% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -16.8% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | 70.0x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $51.37B | $218M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428.77B | $398M |
TTAN vs PCTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTAN vs PCTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 329.0%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 3.49x
- 329.0% revenue growth vs PCTY's 13.7%
PCTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.43
- 218.2% 10Y total return vs TTAN's -35.3%
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 329.0% revenue growth vs PCTY's 13.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 70.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs TTAN's -16.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs TTAN's 0.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -40.6% vs TTAN's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs TTAN's -9.6%, ROIC 26.2% vs -5.6% |
TTAN vs PCTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTAN vs PCTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TTAN and PCTY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1.8x TTAN's $943M. PCTY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTAN's -16.4%. On growth, TTAN holds the edge at +1212.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $943M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42.6B | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41.9B | $258M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39.9B | $470M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.9% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.8% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1212.6% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.3% | +26.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TTAN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$372.1B | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.75x | 27.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.00x | 14.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.13x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY delivers a 22.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-11 for TTAN. TTAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCTY's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs TTAN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +22.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$377.4B | -$180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428.8B | $398M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51.4B | $218M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 23.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PCTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCTY five years ago would be worth $6,478 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,465 for TTAN. Over the past 12 months, PCTY leads with a -40.6% total return vs TTAN's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTAN at -13.5% vs PCTY's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.7% | -25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.7% | -40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -37.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +218.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PCTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTAN's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCTY currently trades 54.0% from its 52-week high vs TTAN's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.33 | $201.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.26 | $92.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.7% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTAN as "Buy" and PCTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 84.5% upside for TTAN (target: $121) vs 54.0% for PCTY (target: $168).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.50 | $168.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
PCTY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TTAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TTAN vs PCTY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTAN or PCTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is the stronger pick with 329. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 7% for Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY). Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTAN or PCTY?
On forward P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 14.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTAN or PCTY?
Over the past 5 years, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) delivered a total return of -35.
2%, compared to -35. 3% for ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCTY returned +218. 2% versus TTAN's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTAN or PCTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus ServiceTitan, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning TTAN is approximately 113% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 18% for Paylocity Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTAN or PCTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is pulling ahead at 329. 0% versus 13. 7% for Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceTitan, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 10. 7% for Paylocity Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTAN leads at 716. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTAN or PCTY?
Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
2% net margin versus -16. 4% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCTY leads at 19. 1% versus -16. 8% for TTAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTAN leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTAN or PCTY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) trades at 14.
0x forward P/E versus 70. 0x for ServiceTitan, Inc. — 56. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTAN: 84. 5% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTAN or PCTY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTAN or PCTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), +218. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCTY: +218. 2%, TTAN: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTAN and PCTY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.