Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $5.93B | $7.51B | $6.91B | $3.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $943M | $1.73B | $2.09B | $563M | $1.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41.86B | $258M | $470M | $-62M | $119M |
| Gross Margin | 69.9% | 69.3% | 81.0% | 77.4% | 89.2% |
| Operating Margin | -16.8% | 21.3% | 28.3% | -14.9% | -0.1% |
| Forward P/E | 70.0x | 14.0x | 13.2x | 63.4x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $51.37B | $218M | $152M | $19M | $312M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428.77B | $398M | $370M | $77M | $1.50B |
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 193.9 | +93.9% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 32.4 | -67.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 329.0%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 3.49x
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 3.49x
- 329.0% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9%
PCTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.43
- 218.2% 10Y total return vs PAYC's 271.8%
- Beta 0.43 vs FROG's 1.24
PAYC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.49 vs PCTY's 0.50
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 19.0x)
- 22.4% margin vs TTAN's -16.4%
- 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
FROG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +65.0% vs MNDY's -72.3%
Among these 5 stocks, MNDY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 329.0% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.4% margin vs TTAN's -16.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs FROG's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.0% vs MNDY's -72.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs TTAN's -9.6%, ROIC 30.7% vs -5.6% |
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FROG leads 1 • TTAN leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • MNDY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PAYC and MNDY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 3.7x FROG's $563M. PAYC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTAN's -16.4%. On growth, TTAN holds the edge at +1212.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $943M | $1.7B | $2.1B | $563M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42.6B | $394M | $780M | -$66M | $12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41.9B | $258M | $470M | -$62M | $119M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39.9B | $470M | $444M | $151M | $321M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.9% | +69.3% | +81.0% | +77.4% | +89.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.8% | +21.3% | +28.3% | -14.9% | -0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +14.9% | +22.4% | -10.9% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +27.2% | +21.2% | +26.9% | +26.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1212.6% | +10.5% | +7.8% | +25.8% | +24.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.3% | +26.7% | +22.6% | +56.3% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TTAN and PAYC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 50% valuation discount to MNDY's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.64x vs PCTY's 0.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $5.9B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$372.1B | $5.8B | $7.3B | $6.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.75x | 27.14x | 17.13x | -91.97x | 34.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.00x | 14.05x | 13.18x | 63.45x | 19.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x | 0.64x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.25x | 9.81x | — | 227.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.72x | 3.66x | 12.99x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 5.00x | 4.49x | 7.47x | 3.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.13x | 17.31x | 18.41x | 48.56x | 12.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-11 for TTAN. FROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNDY's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs PAYC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +22.4% | +31.0% | -7.0% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +4.9% | +9.1% | -4.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +26.2% | +30.7% | -8.0% | -2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +23.3% | +27.1% | -9.6% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.18x | 0.09x | 0.02x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$377.4B | -$180M | -$218M | -$57M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428.8B | $398M | $370M | $77M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51.4B | $218M | $152M | $19M | $312M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 23.29x | 95.85x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FROG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FROG five years ago would be worth $15,879 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,271 for MNDY. Over the past 12 months, FROG leads with a +65.0% total return vs MNDY's -72.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FROG at 38.5% vs PAYC's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.7% | -25.1% | -8.9% | -4.3% | -46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.7% | -40.6% | -38.8% | +65.0% | -72.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -37.1% | -47.8% | +165.6% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -35.2% | -56.3% | +58.8% | -57.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +218.2% | +271.8% | -12.0% | -57.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | -14.3% | -19.5% | +38.5% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCTY and FROG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FROG's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FROG currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs MNDY's 24.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.43x | 0.59x | 1.24x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.33 | $201.97 | $267.76 | $70.43 | $316.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.26 | $92.99 | $104.90 | $33.74 | $57.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.7% | +54.0% | +51.7% | +81.0% | +24.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 45.7 | 49.8 | 67.3 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 733K | 1.4M | 2.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTAN as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold", FROG as "Buy", MNDY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 84.5% upside for TTAN (target: $121) vs 7.9% for PAYC (target: $149). PAYC is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.50 | $168.08 | $149.36 | $68.71 | $133.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 41 | 36 | 22 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.51 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | +4.3% | 0.0% | +3.4% |
PAYC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). FROG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TTAN vs PCTY vs PAYC vs FROG vs MNDY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is the stronger pick with 329. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus monday. com Ltd. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Paycom Software, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paycom Software, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -57. 3% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYC returned +271. 8% versus MNDY's -57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus JFrog Ltd. 's 1. 24β — meaning FROG is approximately 189% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 25% for monday. com Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is pulling ahead at 329. 0% versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: monday. com Ltd. grew EPS 261. 3% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Paycom Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTAN leads at 716. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -16. 4% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYC leads at 27. 6% versus -16. 8% for TTAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 70. 0x for ServiceTitan, Inc. — 56. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTAN: 84. 5% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TTAN, PCTY, FROG, MNDY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTAN or PCTY or PAYC or FROG or MNDY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 1. 1% yield, +271. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAYC: +271. 8%, FROG: -12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTAN and PCTY and PAYC and FROG and MNDY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FROG is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock. PAYC pays a dividend while TTAN, PCTY, FROG, MNDY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.