TTC vs DE

For growth investors, The Toro Company (TTC) is the stronger pick with -1.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). The Toro Company (TTC) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Toro Company (TTC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Toro Company (TTC) is the cheapest at 30.

3x versus Deere & Company at 32. 0x. On forward P/E, The Toro Company is actually cheaper at 21. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deere & Company wins at 2. 03x versus The Toro Company's 23. 23x.

Over the past 5 years, Deere & Company (DE) delivered a total return of +58.

7%, compared to -11. 2% for The Toro Company (TTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +676. 6% versus TTC's +147. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

56β versus The Toro Company's 0. 68β — meaning TTC is approximately 20% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Toro Company (TTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Toro Company (TTC) is pulling ahead at -1.

6% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deere & Company grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for The Toro Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTC leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Deere & Company (DE) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

3% net margin versus 7. 0% for The Toro Company — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 10. 9% for TTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Deere & Company (DE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 03x versus The Toro Company's 23. 23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Toro Company (TTC) trades at 21. 1x forward P/E versus 33. 2x for Deere & Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 15. 0% to $680. 54.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Toro Company (TTC) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 1% for Deere & Company (DE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

56), 1. 1% yield, +676. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +676. 6%, TTC: +147. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.