TTE vs BP

For growth investors, BP p.

l. c. (BP) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). TotalEnergies SE (TTE) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TotalEnergies SE (TTE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the cheapest at 15.

3x versus BP p. l. c. at 2147. 5x. On forward P/E, TotalEnergies SE is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) delivered a total return of +145.

3%, compared to +93. 7% for BP p. l. c. (BP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTE returned +176. 8% versus BP's +101. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

05β versus BP p. l. c. 's -0. 01β — meaning BP is approximately -74% more volatile than TTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 114% for BP p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BP p.

l. c. (BP) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TotalEnergies SE grew EPS -13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for BP p. l. c.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BP leads at -7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

2% net margin versus 0. 0% for BP p. l. c. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTE leads at 10. 9% versus 8. 2% for BP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTE leads at 28. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) trades at 8.

4x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for BP p. l. c. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BP: 0. 2% to $43. 89.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

BP p. l. c. (BP) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 4. 3% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

05), 4. 3% yield, +176. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTE: +176. 8%, BP: +101. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TTE is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.