TTEK vs ACM vs PWR vs MTZ vs MYRG

For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Aecom (ACM). Aecom (ACM) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aecom (ACM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Aecom (ACM) is the cheapest at 19.

4x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Aecom is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tetra Tech, Inc. wins at 2. 47x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x.

Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to +23. 5% for Aecom (ACM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus ACM's +172. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus MYR Group Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning MYRG is approximately 217% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 125% for Aecom — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 0. 2% for Aecom (ACM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTEK leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 47x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Aecom (ACM) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 43. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACM: 54. 2% to $125. 63.

In this comparison, ACM (1.

2% yield), TTEK (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PWR, MTZ, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +450. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +450. 1%, PWR: +31. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TTEK, ACM pay a dividend while PWR, MTZ, MYRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.