TTMI
TTM Technologies, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$15.97B
5Y Perf.+1229.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TTMI vs CTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CTS
CTS Corporation
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+180.5%
TTMI vs CTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TTMI | CTS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $15.97B | $1.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $556M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $204M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 44.1x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $501M | $82M |
TTMI vs CTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TTMI
CTS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTM Technologies, I… (TTMI) | 100 | 1329.0 | +1229.0% |
| CTS Corporation (CTS) | 100 | 280.5 | +180.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTMI vs CTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. TTM Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TTMI
TTM Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
TTMI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.19
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 211.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 23.1% 10Y total return vs CTS's 253.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CTS
CTS Corporation
The Defensive Pick
CTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 1.44, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.30x
- Lower P/E (24.6x vs 44.1x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TTMI | 19.0% revenue growth vs CTS's 5.2% |
| Value | CTS | Lower P/E (24.6x vs 44.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTS | 12.4% margin vs TTMI's 6.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CTS | Beta 1.44 vs TTMI's 3.19, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CTS | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TTMI | +493.0% vs CTS's +53.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTS | 8.9% ROA vs TTMI's 5.2%, ROIC 11.1% vs 8.8% |
TTMI vs CTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2012
TTMI vs CTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTSLAGGINGTTMI
TTMITTM Technologies, Inc.
1leads
CTSCTS Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TTMIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CTS5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTS8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TTMI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CTS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.8x CTS's $556M. CTS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTMI's 6.3%. On growth, TTMI holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $556M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $444M | $123M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $204M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.4% | +10.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.6% | +34.1% |
CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CTS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.3x trailing earnings, CTS trades at a 70% valuation discount to TTMI's 91.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTS's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTMI's 40.6x.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.0B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.6B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 91.53x | 27.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.09x | 24.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.56x | 14.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.49x | 3.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.20x | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.82x |
CTS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTS delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for TTMI. CTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTMI's 0.63x.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +11.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $616M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $501M | $82M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.71x | 18.18x |
CTS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTMI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTMI five years ago would be worth $101,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,321 for CTS. Over the past 12 months, TTMI leads with a +493.0% total return vs CTS's +53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTMI at 137.6% vs CTS's 13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +117.8% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +493.0% | +53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1240.6% | +44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +919.0% | +83.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2314.0% | +253.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +137.6% | +13.1% |
TTMI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTMI's 3.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs TTMI's 85.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.19x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.00 | $60.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.15 | $36.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.5 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 209K |
CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTMI as "Buy" and CTS as "Hold". CTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TTMITTM Technologies,… | CTSCTS Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $158.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CTS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTMI leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallCTS Corporation (CTS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TTMI vs CTS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTMI or CTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TTM Technologies, Inc.
(TTMI) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for CTS Corporation (CTS). CTS Corporation (CTS) offers the better valuation at 27. 3x trailing P/E (24. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTMI or CTS?
On trailing P/E, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the cheapest at 27.
3x versus TTM Technologies, Inc. at 91. 5x. On forward P/E, CTS Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTMI or CTS?
Over the past 5 years, TTM Technologies, Inc.
(TTMI) delivered a total return of +919. 0%, compared to +83. 2% for CTS Corporation (CTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTMI returned +23. 1% versus CTS's +253. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTMI or CTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CTS Corporation (CTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
44β versus TTM Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 19β — meaning TTMI is approximately 121% more volatile than CTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CTS Corporation (CTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 63% for TTM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTMI or CTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TTM Technologies, Inc.
(TTMI) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 5. 2% for CTS Corporation (CTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TTM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 211. 1% year-over-year, compared to 15. 9% for CTS Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTMI leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTMI or CTS?
CTS Corporation (CTS) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus 6. 1% for TTM Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTS leads at 15. 6% versus 9. 0% for TTMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTS leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTMI or CTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CTS Corporation (CTS) trades at 24.
6x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for TTM Technologies, Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTMI or CTS?
In this comparison, CTS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TTMI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTMI or CTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+253.
2% 10Y return). TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) carries a higher beta of 3. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTS: +253. 2%, TTMI: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTMI and CTS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTMI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TTMI: 30.4% · CTS: 10.9%)Net Margin>
%
(TTMI: 6.3% · CTS: 12.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TTMI: 91.5x · CTS: 27.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.