Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.69B | $321M | $160M | $2.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10K | $55M | $279M | $2M | $249M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-164M | $7M | $-24M | $-278K |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 99.6% | 57.1% | -2.4% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | -261.1% | -237.9% | 2.9% | -6.8% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 29.9x | — | 28.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $149M | $66M | $372K | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $15M | $134M | $54M | $51M |
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan Pharmaceutica… (TTNP) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| Materialise N.V. (MTLS) | 100 | 23.9 | -76.1% |
| Oramed Pharmaceutic… (ORMP) | 100 | 90.8 | -9.2% |
| Avadel Pharmaceutic… (AVDL) | 100 | 266.0 | +166.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTNP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs TTNP's -23.2%
MTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 2.7% margin vs TTNP's -280.5%
- 1.8% ROA vs TTNP's -91.9%, ROIC 2.0% vs -122.1%
ORMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 25.19x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 25.19x
AVDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.23
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 74.5%
- 113.0% 10Y total return vs ORMP's -55.2%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs ORMP's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs ORMP's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs TTNP's -280.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs TTNP's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs TTNP's -91.9%, ROIC 2.0% vs -122.1% |
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVDL leads in 1 of 6 categories
MTLS leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • TTNP leads 0 • ORMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVDL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 27851.1x TTNP's $10,000. MTLS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTNP's -280.5%. On growth, AVDL holds the edge at +54.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10,000 | $55M | $279M | $2M | $249M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$130M | $29M | -$14M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$164M | $7M | -$24M | -$278,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$209M | $9M | -$16M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +99.6% | +57.1% | -2.4% | +94.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -261.1% | -2.4% | +2.9% | -6.8% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -280.5% | -3.0% | +2.7% | -12.1% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -274.6% | -3.8% | +3.3% | -8.0% | +14.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% | +5.8% | — | +54.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.6% | -4.5% | +91.5% | +40.9% | +100.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MTLS and AVDL each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.7B | $321M | $160M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $1.8B | $242M | $106M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.59x | -8.57x | 35.61x | -8.32x | -42.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 29.91x | — | 28.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.98x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.64x | 1.06x | — | 12.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 15.66x | 1.07x | 1.10x | 27.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.92x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTLS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTLS delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. ORMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTLS scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -100.6% | -4.0% | +3.0% | -15.7% | -0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -91.9% | -62.8% | +1.8% | -14.9% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -122.1% | -57.2% | +2.0% | -6.5% | -76.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -100.4% | -55.7% | +1.6% | -8.1% | -34.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.66x | 0.26x | 0.00x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $134M | -$68M | -$54M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $15M | $134M | $54M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $149M | $66M | $372,000 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -4.74x | 1.80x | -1.66x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVDL five years ago would be worth $26,487 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $655 for TTNP. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs TTNP's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs TTNP's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +92.0% | -0.2% | +43.0% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.2% | +818.2% | +3.8% | +87.4% | +128.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +621.8% | -38.6% | +37.3% | +45.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -72.3% | -79.7% | -62.0% | +164.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -59.1% | -19.3% | -55.2% | +113.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | +93.3% | -15.0% | +11.1% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORMP and AVDL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORMP currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TTNP's 7.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.85x | 1.29x | 1.21x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.00 | $109.00 | $6.80 | $4.22 | $23.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.81 | $7.99 | $4.78 | $1.98 | $8.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.9% | +76.5% | +80.0% | +92.7% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 53.4 | 62.4 | 56.9 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 991K | 83K | 126K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NKTR as "Buy", MTLS as "Buy", ORMP as "Buy", AVDL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 83.8% upside for MTLS (target: $10) vs 4.0% for AVDL (target: $23).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $132.83 | $10.00 | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 12 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
AVDL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MTLS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TTNP vs NKTR vs MTLS vs ORMP vs AVDL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger pick with 504.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ORMP). Materialise N. V. (MTLS) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
On forward P/E, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc is actually cheaper at 28.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
Over the past 5 years, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) delivered a total return of +164.
9%, compared to -93. 4% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TTNP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVDL returned +113. 0% versus TTNP's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
23β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 707% more volatile than AVDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ORMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is pulling ahead at 504.
8% versus -100. 0% for Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ORMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -435. 7% for Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTLS leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
Materialise N.
V. (MTLS) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -280. 5% for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTLS leads at 1. 9% versus -261. 1% for TTNP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) trades at 28.
3x forward P/E versus 29. 9x for Materialise N. V. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTLS: 83. 8% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTNP or NKTR or MTLS or ORMP or AVDL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), +113. 0% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVDL: +113. 0%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTNP and NKTR and MTLS and ORMP and AVDL?
These companies operate in different sectors (TTNP (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and MTLS (Technology) and ORMP (Healthcare) and AVDL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TTNP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ORMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVDL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.