Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TTWO vs RBLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
TTWO vs RBLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $46.67B | $32.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.56B | $5.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.96B | $-1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | -24.0% |
| Forward P/E | 57.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $4.11B | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.46B | $1.21B |
TTWO vs RBLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTWO vs RBLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.63
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs RBLX's -35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.78x
RBLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 35.8% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3%
- -20.7% margin vs TTWO's -60.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% revenue growth vs TTWO's 5.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -20.7% margin vs TTWO's -60.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs RBLX's 1.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.3% vs RBLX's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.2% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC -87.7% vs -49.8% |
TTWO vs RBLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TTWO vs RBLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTWO and RBLX operate at a comparable scale, with $6.6B and $5.3B in trailing revenue. RBLX is the more profitable business, keeping -20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTWO's -60.4%. On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.7B | -$1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.0B | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $488M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.3% | -24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | -20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +31.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | +39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | -9.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RBLX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.7B | $32.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.3B | $32.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | -29.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.26x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.28x | 6.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.31x | 82.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTWO delivers a -113.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-113 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RBLX. TTWO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBLX's 4.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBLX scores 6/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -113.4% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.6% | -12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.8% | -87.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.1% | -31.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.92x | 4.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | $431M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.94x | -27.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTWO five years ago would be worth $13,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,594 for RBLX. Over the past 12 months, TTWO leads with a -1.3% total return vs RBLX's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 21.2% vs RBLX's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -44.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.3% | -36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.8% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | -34.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +544.3% | -35.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.2% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TTWO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTWO is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RBLX's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TTWO currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs RBLX's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $264.79 | $150.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $187.63 | $41.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +29.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 29.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTWO as "Buy" and RBLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.4% upside for RBLX (target: $89) vs 30.3% for TTWO (target: $291).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $291.25 | $88.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 56 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RBLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TTWO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
TTWO vs RBLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTWO or RBLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TTWO or RBLX?
Over the past 5 years, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) delivered a total return of +31. 4%, compared to -34. 1% for Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +544. 3% versus RBLX's -35. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TTWO or RBLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Roblox Corporation's 1. 57β — meaning RBLX is approximately 147% more volatile than TTWO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 192% versus 4% for Roblox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TTWO or RBLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus 5. 3% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roblox Corporation grew EPS -6. 9% year-over-year, compared to -16. 2% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TTWO or RBLX?
Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the more profitable company, earning -21.
8% net margin versus -79. 5% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps -21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBLX leads at -25. 2% versus -77. 9% for TTWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBLX leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TTWO or RBLX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 98.
4% to $88. 81.
07Which pays a better dividend — TTWO or RBLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TTWO or RBLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +544. 3% 10Y return). Roblox Corporation (RBLX) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTWO: +544. 3%, RBLX: -35. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TTWO and RBLX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.