Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $62.18B | $4.36B | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $2.45B | $710M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $6M | $-1.63B | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 31.1% | 99.8% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 8.2% | 38.1% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.5x | — | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $2.99B | $997M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $2.45B | $1M | $10M |
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1968.6 | +1868.6% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 41.1 | -58.9% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs TURB's -70.3%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
- 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- +14.6% vs TURB's -43.3%
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.57, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 2.57, current ratio 2.03x
SPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 2.13 vs BE's 3.61
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.13 vs BE's 3.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs TURB's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9% |
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
TURB leads 1 • SPWR leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 260.1x TURB's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (BE) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $2.4B | $710M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $240M | -$1.5B | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $6M | -$1.6B | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $233M | -$2M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +31.1% | +99.8% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +8.2% | +38.1% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +0.2% | -2.3% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +9.5% | -0.3% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | +130.4% | +17.6% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +3.3% | +95.9% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TURB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $62.2B | $4.4B | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $62.7B | $5.4B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | -699.03x | — | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.47x | — | 5.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 508.37x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 30.72x | 6.14x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 78.41x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1087.24x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TURB and BE and PLUG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. TURB carries lower financial leverage with a 2.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +0.8% | -124.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +0.2% | -64.3% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +4.1% | +10.9% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +2.5% | +18.6% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 3.77x | 19.75x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $538M | $996M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $2.5B | $1M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3.0B | $997M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 1.05x | -36.18x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs TURB's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.3% | +162.1% | +40.4% | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | +1464.7% | +303.6% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +1425.9% | -66.3% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +1013.4% | -86.4% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +934.6% | +62.2% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | +148.0% | -30.4% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.42x | 3.62x | 2.55x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $302.99 | $4.58 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $16.18 | $0.69 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +85.4% | +68.3% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 72.6 | 63.3 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 10.1M | 76.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.56 | $3.91 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 38 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TURB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TURB vs BE vs PLUG vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.
4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately -355% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR?
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
4% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 118. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
07Which pays a better dividend — TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TURB or BE or PLUG or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TURB and BE and PLUG and SPWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TURB (Energy) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.