TUSK vs NINE

For growth investors, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the stronger pick with -76. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -35. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NINE returned -62. 3% versus TUSK's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 388% more volatile than TUSK relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is pulling ahead at -76. 4% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -12. 6% for Nine Energy Service, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 2% net margin versus -143. 9% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NINE leads at 2. 0% versus -143. 9% for TUSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TUSK leads at 45. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TUSK: -78. 5%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TUSK (Industrials) and NINE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.