Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
Electrical Equipment & Parts
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.42B | $1.18B | $4.36B | $23.06B | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $318M | $5.60B | $710M | $5.42B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $-104M | $-1.63B | $1.67B | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 18.3% | 99.8% | 41.7% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 0.1% | 38.1% | 33.0% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | — | — | 12.0x | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $7.68B | $997M | $499M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $653M | $1.91B | $1M | $2.80B | $2.45B |
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuya Inc. (TUYA) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) | 100 | 35.6 | -64.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 245.8 | +145.8% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 956.2 | +856.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TUYA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.80, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.80, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 9.57x
- Beta 1.80, yield 2.3%, current ratio 9.57x
CSIQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 123.6x)
- 30.7% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- Beta 1.39 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
- 12.6% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs 10.9%
BE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 324.1%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
- +14.6% vs TUYA's +9.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 123.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs TUYA's +9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs 10.9% |
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 1 of 6 categories
BE leads 1 • TUYA leads 1 • CSIQ leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLUG and FSLR and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 17.6x TUYA's $318M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318M | $5.6B | $710M | $5.4B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $284M | -$1.5B | $2.2B | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | -$104M | -$1.6B | $1.7B | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$1.7B | -$2M | $1.7B | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | +18.3% | +99.8% | +41.7% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +0.1% | +38.1% | +33.0% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -1.9% | -2.3% | +30.7% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | -29.6% | -0.3% | +30.8% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -20.0% | +17.6% | +23.6% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.7% | +95.9% | +65.1% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CSIQ and FSLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 95% valuation discount to TUYA's 282.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.2B | $4.4B | $23.1B | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $770M | $7.0B | $5.4B | $20.8B | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 282.35x | -11.41x | — | 15.10x | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.20x | — | — | 12.04x | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.38x | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.75x | 0.21x | 6.14x | 4.42x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.28x | — | 2.42x | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.61x | — | — | 19.42x | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. TUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TUYA scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -2.5% | -124.4% | +18.0% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -0.7% | -64.3% | +12.6% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | -0.2% | +10.9% | +17.6% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | -0.3% | +18.6% | +15.9% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.80x | 19.75x | 0.05x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$649M | $5.8B | $996M | -$2.3B | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $653M | $1.9B | $1M | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $7.7B | $997M | $499M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.02x | -36.18x | 53.51x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs TUYA's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | -30.4% | +40.4% | -21.8% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.8% | +97.1% | +303.6% | +65.3% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | -52.3% | -66.3% | +20.9% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | -55.4% | -86.4% | +187.6% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +14.4% | +62.2% | +324.1% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.2% | -21.9% | -30.4% | +6.5% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSLR and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs CSIQ's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 2.23x | 2.57x | 1.39x | 3.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $34.59 | $4.58 | $285.99 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $8.84 | $0.69 | $125.80 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +51.1% | +68.3% | +75.0% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 62.4 | 63.3 | 64.3 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.5M | 76.5M | 2.1M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TUYA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TUYA as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for CSIQ (target: $29) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188). TUYA is the only dividend payer here at 2.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.69 | $28.88 | $3.91 | $264.13 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 33 | 38 | 73 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.9% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FSLR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TUYA vs CSIQ vs PLUG vs FSLR vs BE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tuya Inc. (TUYA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Tuya Inc. at 282. 4x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.
4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus TUYA's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 159% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tuya Inc. (TUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tuya Inc. grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -387. 0% for Canadian Solar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -15. 9% for TUYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 111. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 63. 3% to $28. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE?
In this comparison, TUYA (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CSIQ, PLUG, FSLR, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TUYA or CSIQ or PLUG or FSLR or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, CSIQ: +14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TUYA and CSIQ and PLUG and FSLR and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (TUYA (Technology) and CSIQ (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials) and FSLR (Energy) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TUYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TUYA pays a dividend while CSIQ, PLUG, FSLR, BE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.