Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TV vs LILA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
TV vs LILA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58.64B | $4.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8.70B | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 50.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $91.58B | $9.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36.43B | $14M |
TV vs LILA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Televisa, S.A… (TV) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
| Liberty Latin Ameri… (LILA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TV vs LILA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 88.9%, current ratio 2.12x
- Beta 0.58, yield 4.5%, current ratio 2.12x
LILA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.6%
- -79.9% 10Y total return vs TV's -84.5%
- -0.3% revenue growth vs TV's -11.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.3% revenue growth vs TV's -11.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -11.2% margin vs TV's -14.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs LILA's 0.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.3% vs LILA's +42.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.7% ROA vs LILA's -5.5%, ROIC 2.0% vs 5.6% |
TV vs LILA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TV vs LILA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LILA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TV is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.6B annually — 13.2x LILA's $4.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -11.2% (LILA) to -14.8% (TV). On growth, LILA holds the edge at -0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58.6B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.8B | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8.7B | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $345M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +50.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.8% | -11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +84.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TV's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LILA's 6.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.58x | -2.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.16x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.94x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.65x | 5.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LILA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TV delivers a -7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-41 for LILA. TV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LILA's 8.67x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | -41.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | -5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 8.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $55.1B | $9.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36.4B | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91.6B | $9.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | 1.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LILA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LILA five years ago would be worth $5,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,947 for TV. Over the past 12 months, TV leads with a +62.3% total return vs LILA's +42.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LILA at -2.2% vs TV's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.3% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.3% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -46.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | -79.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TV and LILA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TV is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LILA's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LILA currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs TV's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.49 | $9.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.76 | $4.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 261K |
Analyst Outlook
TV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TV as "Hold" and LILA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.7% upside for TV (target: $7) vs 2.4% for LILA (target: $8). TV is the only dividend payer here at 4.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% |
LILA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TV vs LILA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TV or LILA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) is the stronger pick with -0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 3% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). Analysts rate Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TV or LILA?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) delivered a total return of -46. 0%, compared to -70. 5% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LILA returned -79. 9% versus TV's -84. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TV or LILA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Televisa, S.
A. B. (TV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Liberty Latin America Ltd. 's 0. 71β — meaning LILA is approximately 21% more volatile than TV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 9% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TV or LILA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) is pulling ahead at -0. 3% versus -11. 3% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. (TV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liberty Latin America Ltd. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -23. 9% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LILA leads at -2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TV or LILA?
Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) is the more profitable company, earning -13. 8% net margin versus -15. 0% for Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. — meaning it keeps -13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LILA leads at 16. 2% versus 8. 2% for TV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LILA leads at 57. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TV or LILA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TV: 129.
7% to $6. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — TV or LILA?
In this comparison, TV (4.
5% yield) pays a dividend. LILA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TV or LILA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Televisa, S.
A. B. (TV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TV: -84. 5%, LILA: -79. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TV and LILA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LILA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TV pays a dividend while LILA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.