Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TVGN vs ADMA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TVGN vs ADMA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.48B | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $510M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $165M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $88M |
TVGN vs ADMA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tevogen Bio Holding… (TVGN) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | 100 | 584.1 | +484.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TVGN vs ADMA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TVGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 47.6%
ADMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22
- 39.8% 10Y total return vs TVGN's -98.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 6.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs TVGN's -6.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.4% margin vs TVGN's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs TVGN's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -64.1% vs TVGN's -85.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs TVGN's -6.9% |
TVGN vs ADMA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TVGN vs ADMA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADMA and TVGN operate at a comparable scale, with $510M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $510M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $221M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $165M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +32.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +72.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TVGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.91x | 14.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 73.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADMA scores 5/9 vs TVGN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +36.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +38.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -219.56x | 50.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $48,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for TVGN. Over the past 12 months, ADMA leads with a -64.1% total return vs TVGN's -85.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 34.3% vs TVGN's -76.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.9% | -52.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.6% | -64.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +142.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +386.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +39.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.0% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ADMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TVGN's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADMA currently trades 35.3% from its 52-week high vs TVGN's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.50 | $23.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $7.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +35.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TVGN as "Hold" and ADMA as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
ADMA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TVGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
TVGN vs ADMA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TVGN or ADMA a better buy right now?
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TVGN or ADMA?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) delivered a total return of +386. 8%, compared to -98. 5% for Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADMA returned +39. 8% versus TVGN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TVGN or ADMA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning TVGN is approximately 66% more volatile than ADMA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TVGN or ADMA?
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for TVGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADMA leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TVGN or ADMA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is TVGN or ADMA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADMA: +39. 8%, TVGN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TVGN and ADMA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TVGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.