Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.48B | $6.56B | $5.88B | $8.76B | $12.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $700M | $0.00 | $4.03B | $2.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $462M | $-464M | $-185M | $460M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.0% | — | 31.9% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.3% | — | 11.8% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.9x | — | 16.0x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $261M | $98K | $3.07B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $79M | $714M | $214M | $497M |
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tevogen Bio Holding… (TVGN) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 370.4 | +270.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 414.0 | +314.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TVGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.84
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 4.10x
IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +102.4% vs TVGN's -86.3%
CRL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x)
MEDP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs TGTX's 434.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.3% revenue growth vs TVGN's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs TVGN's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs TVGN's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.4% vs TVGN's -86.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs TVGN's -6.9% |
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MEDP leads 2 • TGTX leads 1 • TVGN leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $700M | $0 | $4.0B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $150M | -$487M | $824M | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $462M | -$464M | -$185M | $460M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$14M | -$423M | $391M | $745M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.0% | — | +31.9% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.3% | — | +11.8% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% | — | -4.6% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% | — | +9.7% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.6% | — | +1.2% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +2.9% | +19.7% | -160.0% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGTX trades at a 44% valuation discount to MEDP's 27.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 54.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $6.6B | $5.9B | $8.8B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $6.7B | $5.2B | $11.6B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.91x | 15.47x | -10.60x | -61.04x | 27.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.87x | — | 16.00x | 24.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 54.57x | — | 12.75x | 21.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.65x | — | 2.18x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.68x | 6.20x | 2.74x | 27.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 16.90x | 17.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +87.4% | -47.1% | -5.7% | +120.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +42.8% | -44.1% | -2.5% | +24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.4% | — | +6.3% | +154.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.7% | -66.1% | +8.1% | +65.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.40x | 0.00x | 0.95x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $182M | -$714M | $2.9B | -$247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $79M | $714M | $214M | $497M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $261M | $98,000 | $3.1B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -219.56x | 5.67x | — | 4.29x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for TVGN. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +102.4% total return vs TVGN's -86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 26.5% vs TVGN's -76.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.9% | +46.4% | +11.7% | -12.3% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.3% | +26.6% | +102.4% | +25.7% | +41.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +29.5% | +49.8% | -6.5% | +102.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +13.1% | +84.4% | -46.6% | +167.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +434.4% | +190.9% | +114.0% | +1425.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.0% | +9.0% | +14.4% | -2.2% | +26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TGTX and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TVGN's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TVGN's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.84x | 1.36x | 1.44x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.50 | $44.65 | $30.09 | $228.88 | $628.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $25.28 | $13.36 | $132.58 | $284.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +96.0% | +96.2% | +77.6% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 76.0 | 50.6 | 57.4 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 2.1M | 1.4M | 792K | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
CRL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TVGN as "Hold", TGTX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.50 | $45.50 | $206.43 | $498.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +7.6% |
CRL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MEDP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
TVGN vs TGTX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (32. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
On trailing P/E, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +167. 0%, compared to -98. 5% for Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1426% versus TVGN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning TVGN is approximately 134% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGTX leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
(CRL) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 32. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 57. 2% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TVGN or TGTX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +1426% 10Y return). Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1426%, TVGN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TVGN and TGTX and IMVT and CRL and MEDP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TVGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.