Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Parts
Agricultural - Machinery
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $512M | $3.12B | $1.97B | $317M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.84B | $2.40B | $17.91B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-87M | $108M | $-2.08B | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 14.4% | 14.7% | 2.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 7.1% | 1.6% | -3.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x | 22.7x | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $711M | $56M | $7.26B | $443M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $35M | $801M | $32M |
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan International… (TWI) | 100 | 650.4 | +550.4% |
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 1047.5 | +947.5% |
| The Goodyear Tire &… (GT) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
REVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- 174.2% 10Y total return vs TWI's 36.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 13.5%, current ratio 1.51x
GT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.96 vs WNC's 1.93
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 22.7x)
- 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 22.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs GT's -11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs WNC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.3% vs GT's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs GT's -10.5%, ROIC 29.9% vs 4.3% |
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories
GT leads 1 • WNC leads 1 • TWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.9B annually — 12.2x WNC's $1.5B. REVG is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GT's -11.6%. On growth, REVG holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $2.4B | $17.9B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $193M | $1.1B | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$87M | $108M | -$2.1B | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $200M | -$126M | -$38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +14.4% | +14.7% | +2.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +7.1% | +1.6% | -3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +4.5% | -11.6% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +8.3% | -0.7% | -2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +11.3% | -8.7% | -20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.0% | +68.6% | -3.1% | -120.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to REVG's 33.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REVG's 14.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $512M | $3.1B | $2.0B | $317M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $3.1B | $8.4B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.00x | 33.81x | -1.15x | 1.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.18x | 22.70x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.61x | 14.35x | 4.96x | 1.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 1.27x | 0.11x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 7.73x | 0.58x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.41x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-55 for GT. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GT's 2.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs WNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.0% | +27.9% | -55.3% | -17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.1% | +8.9% | -10.5% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +29.9% | +4.3% | +37.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +27.0% | +5.2% | +32.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 0.13x | 2.13x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $508M | $21M | $6.5B | $411M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $35M | $801M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $711M | $56M | $7.3B | $443M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 6.03x | -0.29x | -0.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,488 for GT. Over the past 12 months, REVG leads with a +80.3% total return vs GT's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +2.6% | -23.1% | -11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.5% | +80.3% | -37.7% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | +535.6% | -39.9% | -63.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | +261.2% | -65.1% | -48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.7% | +174.2% | -68.6% | -22.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.9% | +85.2% | -15.6% | -28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REVG and GT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GT is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REVG currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs GT's 57.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.48x | 0.96x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.70 | $69.92 | $12.03 | $12.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.43 | $34.96 | $6.14 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.4% | +91.4% | +57.0% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 50.6 | 57.3 | 37.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 928K | 1.6M | 7.9M | 598K |
Analyst Outlook
WNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWI as "Hold", REVG as "Hold", GT as "Hold", WNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $55.00 | $8.15 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 | 26 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.26 | — | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +0.3% | +10.6% |
REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TWI vs REVG vs GT vs WNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWI or REVG or GT or WNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Titan International, Inc. (TWI) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, REV Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -65. 1% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus GT's -68. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
96β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 100% more volatile than GT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, REVG leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus -9. 4% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 1. 1% for TWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GT leads at 18. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWI or REVG or GT or WNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWI or REVG or GT or WNC?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. TWI, GT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TWI or REVG or GT or WNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
96)). Titan International, Inc. (TWI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GT: -68. 6%, TWI: +36. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWI and REVG and GT and WNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (TWI (Industrials) and REVG (Industrials) and GT (Consumer Cyclical) and WNC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock. WNC pays a dividend while TWI, REVG, GT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.