TX vs MT

For growth investors, ArcelorMittal S.

A. (MT) is the stronger pick with -1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 6% for Ternium S. A. (TX). ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ternium S. A. (TX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ArcelorMittal S.

A. (MT) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Ternium S. A. at 20. 1x. On forward P/E, Ternium S. A. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ArcelorMittal S.

A. (MT) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +55. 8% for Ternium S. A. (TX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MT returned +280. 9% versus TX's +239. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ternium S.

A. (TX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus ArcelorMittal S. A. 's 1. 70β — meaning MT is approximately 112% more volatile than TX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ternium S. A. (TX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 24% for ArcelorMittal S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ArcelorMittal S.

A. (MT) is pulling ahead at -1. 7% versus -11. 6% for Ternium S. A. (TX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ternium S. A. grew EPS 914. 8% year-over-year, compared to 143. 2% for ArcelorMittal S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TX leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ArcelorMittal S.

A. (MT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for Ternium S. A. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MT leads at 5. 9% versus 4. 5% for TX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TX leads at 15. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Ternium S.

A. (TX) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for ArcelorMittal S. A. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MT: -6. 3% to $54. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ternium S. A. (TX) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 0. 9% for ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ternium S.

A. (TX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), 6. 1% yield, +239. 9% 10Y return). ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TX: +239. 9%, MT: +280. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.