TXNM vs IDA

For growth investors, TXNM Energy, Inc.

(TXNM) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for IDACORP, Inc. (IDA). IDACORP, Inc. (IDA) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, IDACORP, Inc.

(IDA) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus TXNM Energy, Inc. at 36. 6x. On forward P/E, TXNM Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, IDACORP, Inc.

(IDA) delivered a total return of +54. 4%, compared to +34. 0% for TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDA returned +133. 6% versus TXNM's +118. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TXNM Energy, Inc.

(TXNM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus IDACORP, Inc. 's 0. 14β — meaning IDA is approximately 110% more volatile than TXNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 102% for IDACORP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TXNM Energy, Inc.

(TXNM) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -0. 7% for IDACORP, Inc. (IDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IDACORP, Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -39. 3% for TXNM Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDA leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

IDACORP, Inc.

(IDA) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus 7. 0% for TXNM Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDA leads at 21. 9% versus 20. 4% for TXNM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXNM leads at 38. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TXNM Energy, Inc.

(TXNM) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for IDACORP, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDA: 4. 9% to $150. 29.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 4% for IDACORP, Inc. (IDA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, TXNM Energy, Inc.

(TXNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 0% yield, +118. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXNM: +118. 1%, IDA: +133. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.