Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TXT vs LHX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
TXT vs LHX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $16.21B | $56.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.19B | $22.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $934M | $1.73B |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 24.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.28B | $10.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.02B | $1.07B |
TXT vs LHX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textron Inc. (TXT) | 100 | 300.6 | +200.6% |
| L3Harris Technologi… (LHX) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXT vs LHX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- PEG 0.47 vs LHX's 2.49
- 8.0% revenue growth vs LHX's 2.5%
LHX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.6%
- 353.9% 10Y total return vs TXT's 145.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 53.2%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% revenue growth vs LHX's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 26.1x), PEG 0.47 vs 2.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs TXT's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TXT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs TXT's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs TXT's +34.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs LHX's 4.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs 5.4% |
TXT vs LHX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXT vs LHX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LHX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LHX and TXT operate at a comparable scale, with $22.5B and $15.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.7% (LHX) to 6.1% (TXT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $22.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $934M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $707M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +24.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TXT leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, TXT trades at a 49% valuation discount to LHX's 35.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXT offers better value at 0.60x vs LHX's 3.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.2B | $56.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.5B | $65.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.22x | 35.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.39x | 26.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 3.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.19x | 19.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.33x | 21.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXT delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for LHX. LHX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXT's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LHX scores 9/9 vs TXT's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.38x | 4.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LHX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LHX five years ago would be worth $14,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,889 for TXT. Over the past 12 months, LHX leads with a +42.0% total return vs TXT's +34.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LHX at 19.1% vs TXT's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.1% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.0% | +68.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | +49.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.6% | +353.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXT and LHX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LHX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXT currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs LHX's 79.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.57 | $379.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.46 | $214.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +79.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 24.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LHX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TXT as "Hold" and LHX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for LHX (target: $352) vs 11.5% for TXT (target: $104). For income investors, LHX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.59% vs TXT's 0.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.80 | $352.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $4.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +2.0% |
LHX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TXT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TXT vs LHX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXT or LHX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Textron Inc.
(TXT) is the stronger pick with 8. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Textron Inc. (TXT) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXT or LHX?
On trailing P/E, Textron Inc.
(TXT) is the cheapest at 18. 2x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Textron Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Textron Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXT or LHX?
Over the past 5 years, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
(LHX) delivered a total return of +49. 8%, compared to +38. 9% for Textron Inc. (TXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LHX returned +353. 9% versus TXT's +145. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXT or LHX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
(LHX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Textron Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning TXT is approximately 132% more volatile than LHX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 54% for Textron Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXT or LHX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Textron Inc.
(TXT) is pulling ahead at 8. 0% versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Textron Inc. grew EPS 18. 0% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LHX leads at 8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXT or LHX?
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
(LHX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 3% net margin versus 6. 2% for Textron Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LHX leads at 10. 0% versus 8. 4% for TXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LHX leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXT or LHX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Textron Inc. (TXT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Textron Inc. (TXT) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LHX: 16. 6% to $352. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXT or LHX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 1% for Textron Inc. (TXT).
09Is TXT or LHX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
(LHX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 6% yield, +353. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LHX: +353. 9%, TXT: +145. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXT and LHX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LHX pays a dividend while TXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.