Solar
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
Banks - Diversified
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $212M | $6.89B | $3.53B | $27.69B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $1.40B | $1.28B | $5.42B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $135M | $-364M | $1.67B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | 44.2% | 18.2% | 41.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | 6.8% | -17.9% | 33.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 65.6x | 25.9x | 4570.9x | 14.6x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.24B | $423M | $499M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $474M | $540M | $2.80B | $343.34B |
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 270.0 | +170.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 198.7 | +98.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TYGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.7%, EPS growth 97.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 91.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 23.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
SEDG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +241.9% vs JPM's +20.9%
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- PEG 0.47 vs ENPH's 4.10
- Beta 1.57, current ratio 2.67x
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 4570.9x)
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- Beta 0.87 vs SEDG's 2.35
- 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 4570.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SEDG's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs SEDG's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +241.9% vs JPM's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SEDG's -15.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -29.5% |
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • TYGO leads 0 • ENPH leads 0 • SEDG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FSLR and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2550.9x TYGO's $110M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, SEDG holds the edge at +41.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $5.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $171M | -$210M | $2.2B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $135M | -$364M | $1.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $145M | $78M | $1.7B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +44.2% | +18.2% | +41.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +6.8% | -17.9% | +33.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +9.6% | -28.6% | +30.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +10.4% | +6.1% | +30.8% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | -20.6% | +41.5% | +23.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | -127.3% | +43.5% | +65.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 60% valuation discount to ENPH's 40.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.59x vs ENPH's 6.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $212M | $6.9B | $3.5B | $27.7B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $207M | $7.7B | $3.4B | $25.4B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -93.00x | 40.53x | -8.41x | 18.14x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.65x | 25.88x | 4570.87x | 14.56x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.42x | — | 0.59x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.23x | — | 11.47x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 4.68x | 2.98x | 5.31x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.57x | 6.49x | 8.12x | 2.91x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.93x | 71.85x | 43.70x | 23.32x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.4% | +13.3% | -79.6% | +18.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +4.2% | -15.9% | +12.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | +6.8% | -29.5% | +17.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +6.8% | -19.2% | +15.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.14x | 0.99x | 0.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $769M | -$116M | -$2.3B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $474M | $540M | $2.8B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $1.2B | $423M | $499M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.37x | 47.60x | -2.65x | 53.51x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SEDG and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $33,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,197 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +241.9% total return vs JPM's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs TYGO's -46.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.8% | +54.9% | +85.1% | -6.1% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.4% | +43.7% | +241.9% | +79.4% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | -69.6% | -77.3% | +38.5% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | -68.5% | -78.0% | +234.8% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | +2343.0% | +180.2% | +422.5% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.1% | -32.8% | -39.0% | +11.5% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEDG's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TYGO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 2.32x | 2.35x | 1.57x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.33 | $73.74 | $81.17 | $320.95 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.14 | $25.78 | $15.75 | $139.26 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +70.9% | +71.5% | +80.3% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.2 | 42.6 | 44.1 | 47.3 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 667K | 8.1M | 3.9M | 2.6M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TYGO as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.1% upside for TYGO (target: $7) vs -40.6% for SEDG (target: $35). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.70 | $47.61 | $34.50 | $254.92 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 55 | 48 | 73 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.8% |
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
TYGO vs ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) is the stronger pick with 91. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. at 40. 5x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 4. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +234. 8%, compared to -78. 0% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +23. 4% versus TYGO's -71. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning SEDG is approximately 171% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) is pulling ahead at 91. 7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tigo Energy, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 4. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 4570. 9x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 4556. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TYGO: 140. 1% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TYGO, ENPH, SEDG, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TYGO or ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, ENPH: +23. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TYGO and ENPH and SEDG and FSLR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (TYGO (Energy) and ENPH (Energy) and SEDG (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TYGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while TYGO, ENPH, SEDG, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.