Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UAVS vs KTOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
UAVS vs KTOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1M | $10.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | -95.5% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $561M |
UAVS vs KTOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AgEagle Aerial Syst… (UAVS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 307.3 | +207.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UAVS vs KTOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UAVS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 17.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
KTOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.84
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs UAVS's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs UAVS's -2.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs UAVS's -153.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.84 vs UAVS's 3.30 | |
| Dividends | 17.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs UAVS's +32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs UAVS's -56.3%, ROIC 1.4% vs -135.0% |
UAVS vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UAVS vs KTOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 112.0x UAVS's $13M. KTOS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UAVS's -153.6%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -95.5% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -153.6% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.4% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | +22.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.4% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
UAVS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | 438.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 118.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 7.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-69 for UAVS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAVS scores 6/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.5% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -135.0% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $898,841 | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $561M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 6.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTOS five years ago would be worth $21,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for UAVS. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs UAVS's +32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs UAVS's -85.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | +58.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +331.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +110.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1231.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.5% | +62.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KTOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KTOS is the less volatile stock with a 1.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAVS's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KTOS currently trades 42.5% from its 52-week high vs UAVS's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.61 | $134.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $32.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.4% | +42.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
UAVS is the only dividend payer here at 17.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $110.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +17.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UAVS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
UAVS vs KTOS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UAVS or KTOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) offers the better valuation at 438. 5x trailing P/E (73. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UAVS or KTOS?
Over the past 5 years, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus UAVS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UAVS or KTOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 84β versus AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning UAVS is approximately 80% more volatile than KTOS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UAVS or KTOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -2. 5% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -475. 1% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTOS leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UAVS or KTOS?
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -261. 6% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTOS leads at 2. 1% versus -94. 3% for UAVS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAVS leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UAVS or KTOS?
In this comparison, UAVS (17.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UAVS or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1232% 10Y return). AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1232%, UAVS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UAVS and KTOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (UAVS (Technology) and KTOS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UAVS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. UAVS pays a dividend while KTOS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.