Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UBXG vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
UBXG vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $593K | $18M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $107M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-376K | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 1.4% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Total Debt | $717K | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $99M |
UBXG vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UBXG vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UBXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.07
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 5.75x
- Beta 0.07, current ratio 5.75x
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
- -99.2% 10Y total return vs UBXG's -99.4%
- -3.7% revenue growth vs UBXG's -45.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.7% revenue growth vs UBXG's -45.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs RCON's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs RCON's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -49.4% vs UBXG's -90.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs RCON's -8.0%, ROIC -13.5% vs -10.6% |
UBXG vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UBXG vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBXG is the larger business by revenue, generating $107M annually — 1.6x RCON's $66M. UBXG is the more profitable business, keeping -0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, RCON holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $107M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$376,428 | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.0% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UBXG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $593,375 | $18M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.80x | -1.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 0.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBXG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UBXG delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-9 for RCON. UBXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCON's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCON scores 4/9 vs UBXG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.9% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.7% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $716,535 | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.74x | -372.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCON five years ago would be worth $58 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $57 for UBXG. Over the past 12 months, RCON leads with a -49.4% total return vs UBXG's -90.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCON at -50.8% vs UBXG's -82.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -81.9% | -42.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.2% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.1% | -50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UBXG and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCON's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCON currently trades 12.4% from its 52-week high vs UBXG's 8.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.50 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.4% | +12.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.8 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 805K | 90K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UBXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RCON leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
UBXG vs RCON: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UBXG or RCON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger pick with -3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 3% for U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UBXG or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) delivered a total return of -99. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCON returned -99. 2% versus UBXG's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UBXG or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U-BX Technology Ltd.
(UBXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Recon Technology, Ltd. 's 0. 47β — meaning RCON is approximately 542% more volatile than UBXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 8% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UBXG or RCON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is pulling ahead at -3. 7% versus -45. 3% for U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Recon Technology, Ltd. grew EPS 52. 6% year-over-year, compared to -435. 7% for U-BX Technology Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCON leads at -7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UBXG or RCON?
U-BX Technology Ltd.
(UBXG) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 5% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps -1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBXG leads at -1. 7% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UBXG or RCON?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UBXG or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U-BX Technology Ltd.
(UBXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBXG: -99. 4%, RCON: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UBXG and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (UBXG (Technology) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.