Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
Steel
Construction
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Steel | Steel | Construction |
| Market Cap | $75M | $533M | $18.87B | $787M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $555M | $1.90B | $14.84B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-40M | $14M | $806M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 3.5% | 82.8% | 27.2% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | 1.9% | 7.5% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.7x | 18.9x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $116M | $313M | $1.99B | $286M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $12M | $217M | $40M |
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unifi, Inc. (UFI) | 100 | 29.4 | -70.6% |
| Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) | 100 | 436.0 | +336.0% |
| Reliance Steel & Al… (RS) | 100 | 380.6 | +280.6% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UFI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.31 vs ZEUS's 1.48, lower leverage
ZEUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +50.3% vs UFI's -12.6%
RS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth -10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
- 463.7% 10Y total return vs ZEUS's 138.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 4.88x
APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.32 vs RS's 0.96
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.32 vs 0.96
- 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs RS's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.32 vs 0.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs UFI's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs ZEUS's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs RS's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.3% vs UFI's -12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 8.9% vs -2.1% |
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RS leads in 3 of 6 categories
UFI leads 0 • ZEUS leads 0 • APOG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RS is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 26.7x UFI's $555M. RS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UFI's -7.2%. On growth, RS holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $555M | $1.9B | $14.8B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $45M | $1.4B | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$40M | $14M | $806M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $42M | $612M | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +82.8% | +27.2% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +1.9% | +7.5% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +0.7% | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +2.2% | +4.1% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.3% | +4.4% | +15.5% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.0% | -21.7% | +36.4% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UFI and APOG each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 45% valuation discount to RS's 26.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs RS's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $75M | $533M | $18.9B | $787M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168M | $834M | $20.6B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | 24.29x | 26.41x | 14.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.72x | 18.94x | 10.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.58x | 1.33x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.67x | 10.59x | 15.87x | 21.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.27x | 1.32x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 0.97x | 2.72x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 127.14x | 37.55x | 8.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RS delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-17 for UFI. RS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APOG's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APOG scores 7/9 vs UFI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.7% | +2.4% | +11.2% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.8% | +1.3% | +7.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +4.3% | +8.9% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +5.6% | +11.2% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.55x | 0.28x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $93M | $301M | $1.8B | $247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $12M | $217M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $116M | $313M | $2.0B | $286M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.43x | 2.15x | 18.77x | 5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RS five years ago would be worth $21,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,465 for UFI. Over the past 12 months, ZEUS leads with a +50.3% total return vs UFI's -12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RS at 16.7% vs UFI's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +9.1% | +25.2% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.6% | +50.3% | +25.8% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.4% | +15.1% | +58.9% | -0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | +51.7% | +119.6% | +12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | +138.5% | +463.7% | +10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.9% | +4.8% | +16.7% | -0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UFI and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZEUS's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RS currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs APOG's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 1.48x | 0.75x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.42 | $52.65 | $381.00 | $49.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.96 | $27.11 | $260.31 | $30.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.5% | +90.9% | +96.9% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 48.2 | 79.2 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 47 | 313K | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RS and APOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZEUS as "Buy", RS as "Hold", APOG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs -14.3% for ZEUS (target: $41). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs ZEUS's 1.20%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $41.00 | $362.00 | $70.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 27 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +1.3% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 23 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | $4.82 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.9% |
RS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
UFI vs ZEUS vs RS vs APOG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
Over the past 5 years, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) delivered a total return of +119. 6%, compared to -85. 3% for Unifi, Inc. (UFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RS returned +463. 7% versus UFI's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Olympic Steel, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ZEUS is approximately 377% more volatile than UFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 56% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unifi, Inc. grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -48. 8% for Olympic Steel, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APOG leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -3. 6% for Unifi, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RS leads at 7. 2% versus -1. 7% for UFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Olympic Steel, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), RS (1. 3% yield), ZEUS (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. UFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UFI or ZEUS or RS or APOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +463. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +463. 7%, ZEUS: +138. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UFI and ZEUS and RS and APOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (UFI (Consumer Cyclical) and ZEUS (Basic Materials) and RS (Basic Materials) and APOG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZEUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. ZEUS, RS, APOG pay a dividend while UFI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.