Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Consulting Services
REIT - Industrial
Consulting Services
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Conglomerates | Consulting Services | REIT - Industrial | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $9.20B | $203M | $2.02B | $8.57B | $1.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $319M | $1.74B | $996M | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $16M | $104M | $212M | $85M |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 27.2% | 23.3% | 61.7% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 7.9% | 11.3% | 54.1% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 136.8x | 12.3x | 14.2x | 30.8x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $7.24B | $26M | $548M | $3.50B | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $989M | $3M | $25M | $166M | $5M |
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U-Haul Holding Comp… (UHAL) | 100 | 161.6 | +61.6% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2133.6 | +2033.6% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| Rexford Industrial … (REXR) | 100 | 90.7 | -9.3% |
| ICF International, … (ICFI) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UHAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 466.9% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3%
- +59.5% vs HURN's -17.2%
Among these 5 stocks, HURN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REXR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 39.6%, current ratio 7.16x
- Beta 0.88, yield 4.9%, current ratio 7.16x
- 21.3% margin vs UHAL's 2.3%
- 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ICFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 0.8%
- PEG 0.92 vs REXR's 2.80
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 30.8x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.80
- Beta 0.52 vs RCMT's 1.30, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 30.8x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.80 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.3% margin vs UHAL's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RCMT's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs HURN's -17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs UHAL's 0.6%, ROIC 26.9% vs 4.2% |
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
REXR leads 1 • UHAL leads 0 • HURN leads 0 • ICFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UHAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 18.8x RCMT's $319M. REXR is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UHAL's 2.3%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $319M | $1.7B | $996M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $27M | $231M | $840M | $201M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $16M | $104M | $212M | $85M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $17M | $124M | $209M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +27.2% | +23.3% | +61.7% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +7.9% | +11.3% | +54.1% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +5.1% | +6.0% | +21.3% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +5.4% | +7.1% | +21.0% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +12.4% | +14.2% | -0.9% | -10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.5% | +116.2% | +0.8% | -2.2% | -22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RCMT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 68% valuation discount to REXR's 42.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICFI offers better value at 1.31x vs REXR's 3.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $203M | $2.0B | $8.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.4B | $226M | $2.5B | $11.9B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.84x | 13.30x | 21.37x | 41.95x | 15.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 136.83x | 12.35x | 14.18x | 30.84x | 10.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.81x | 1.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.10x | 8.01x | 10.99x | 17.09x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 0.63x | 1.19x | 8.54x | 0.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 4.74x | 4.25x | 0.95x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.67x | 11.06x | 41.06x | 11.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $2 for UHAL. REXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs UHAL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +40.9% | +21.8% | +2.3% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +12.5% | +6.8% | +1.6% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +26.9% | +15.0% | +2.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +31.6% | +18.6% | +3.1% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.56x | 1.04x | 0.40x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $23M | $524M | $3.3B | $566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $989M | $3M | $25M | $166M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $26M | $548M | $3.5B | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | 9.05x | 7.70x | 3.09x | 6.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,888 for REXR. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs HURN's -17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 32.8% vs ICFI's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +44.0% | -27.1% | -6.4% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | +59.5% | -17.2% | +12.1% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +134.2% | +62.5% | -27.3% | -32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | +712.2% | +120.2% | -21.1% | -16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.4% | +466.9% | +116.8% | +138.0% | +100.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +32.8% | +17.6% | -10.1% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCMT and ICFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs HURN's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.30x | 0.82x | 0.88x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.64 | $32.50 | $186.78 | $44.38 | $101.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.95 | $17.05 | $112.45 | $32.14 | $64.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.1% | +88.0% | +66.8% | +81.3% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 59.8 | 37.4 | 56.3 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 224K | 67K | 243K | 2.4M | 349K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — REXR and ICFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UHAL as "Buy", RCMT as "Buy", HURN as "Buy", REXR as "Hold", ICFI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.3% upside for HURN (target: $200) vs 17.8% for REXR (target: $43). For income investors, REXR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.92% vs UHAL's 0.35%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | — | $200.00 | $42.50 | $102.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | +4.9% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | — | — | $1.77 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +8.2% | +2.9% | +4.1% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). REXR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
UHAL vs RCMT vs HURN vs REXR vs ICFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. at 42. 0x. On forward P/E, ICF International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICF International, Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. 's 2. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to -21. 1% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCMT returned +466. 9% versus UHAL's +47. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 151% more volatile than ICFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, REXR leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 4. 9% for ICF International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REXR leads at 37. 9% versus 7. 9% for RCMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHAL leads at 85. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. 's 2. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 136. 8x for U-Haul Holding Company — 126. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 60. 3% to $200. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI?
In this comparison, REXR (4.
9% yield), ICFI (0. 8% yield), UHAL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RCMT, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UHAL or RCMT or HURN or REXR or ICFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 0. 8% yield, +100. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICFI: +100. 5%, UHAL: +47. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHAL and RCMT and HURN and REXR and ICFI?
These companies operate in different sectors (UHAL (Industrials) and RCMT (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and REXR (Real Estate) and ICFI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UHAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REXR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. REXR, ICFI pay a dividend while UHAL, RCMT, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.