Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UIS vs CNDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
UIS vs CNDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $221M | $283M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.96B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-346M | $-170M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $803M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $233M |
UIS vs CNDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unisys Corporation (UIS) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UIS vs CNDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth -71.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- -58.7% 10Y total return vs CNDT's -88.6%
- -2.9% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4%
CNDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 95.4%, current ratio 1.57x
- Beta 1.72, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.57x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.6% margin vs UIS's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.72 vs UIS's 2.34 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.6% vs UIS's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.1% ROA vs UIS's -19.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs 16.7% |
UIS vs CNDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UIS vs CNDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 1.6x UIS's $2.0B. CNDT is the more profitable business, keeping -5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UIS's -17.7%. On growth, UIS holds the edge at +1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $321M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$346M | -$170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$185M | -$147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | -146.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNDT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CNDT's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UIS's 2.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $283M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $610M | $839M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -1.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.95x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.67x | 2.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNDT scores 2/9 vs UIS's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.7% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $389M | $556M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $233M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803M | $789M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | -1.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNDT five years ago would be worth $2,434 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,278 for UIS. Over the past 12 months, CNDT leads with a -7.6% total return vs UIS's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UIS at -7.8% vs CNDT's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.7% | -7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -75.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CNDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNDT is the less volatile stock with a 1.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UIS's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNDT currently trades 61.4% from its 52-week high vs UIS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $2.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.97 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.3% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 672K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CNDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UIS as "Hold" and CNDT as "Hold". CNDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.2% |
CNDT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). UIS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
UIS vs CNDT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UIS or CNDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Unisys Corporation (UIS) is the stronger pick with -2.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). Analysts rate Unisys Corporation (UIS) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UIS or CNDT?
Over the past 5 years, Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) delivered a total return of -75.
7%, compared to -87. 2% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UIS returned -58. 7% versus CNDT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UIS or CNDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
72β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning UIS is approximately 37% more volatile than CNDT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UIS or CNDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Unisys Corporation (UIS) is pulling ahead at -2.
9% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unisys Corporation grew EPS -71. 0% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, UIS leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UIS or CNDT?
Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the more profitable company, earning -5.
6% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps -5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UIS leads at 6. 8% versus 4. 5% for CNDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UIS leads at 28. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UIS or CNDT?
In this comparison, CNDT (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. UIS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UIS or CNDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.
4% yield). Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNDT: -88. 6%, UIS: -58. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UIS and CNDT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CNDT pays a dividend while UIS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.