Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $221M | $2.04B | $16.51B | $4.24B | $283M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.96B | $12.64B | $17.48B | $7.26B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-346M | $18M | $1.36B | $358M | $-170M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 13.7% | 17.3% | 12.0% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 2.8% | 11.6% | 7.1% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | 3.8x | 11.1x | 9.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $803M | $4.55B | $5.93B | $217M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $1.80B | $1.20B | $182M | $233M |
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unisys Corporation (UIS) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| DXC Technology Comp… (DXC) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| Leidos Holdings, In… (LDOS) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| Science Application… (SAIC) | 100 | 106.9 | +6.9% |
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, UIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DXC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
LDOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 20.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 223.8% 10Y total return vs SAIC's 104.4%
- PEG 0.54 vs SAIC's 0.56
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.70x
SAIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.26 vs UIS's 2.34
CNDT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LDOS's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- -7.6% vs UIS's -35.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs UIS's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs UIS's 2.34 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LDOS's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.6% vs UIS's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs UIS's -19.4%, ROIC 17.1% vs 16.7% |
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LDOS leads in 3 of 6 categories
SAIC leads 1 • UIS leads 0 • DXC leads 0 • CNDT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LDOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LDOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.5B annually — 8.9x UIS's $2.0B. LDOS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UIS's -17.7%. On growth, LDOS holds the edge at +3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $12.6B | $17.5B | $7.3B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $1.5B | $2.2B | $666M | $321M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$346M | $18M | $1.4B | $358M | -$170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$185M | $939M | $1.7B | $609M | -$147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | +12.0% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +2.8% | +11.6% | +7.1% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | +0.1% | +7.8% | +4.9% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +7.4% | +9.6% | +8.4% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | -1.2% | +3.7% | -4.8% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | -158.7% | -7.6% | -6.5% | -146.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DXC and CNDT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, DXC trades at a 53% valuation discount to SAIC's 12.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LDOS offers better value at 0.57x vs SAIC's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $2.0B | $16.5B | $4.2B | $283M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $610M | $4.8B | $21.2B | $4.3B | $839M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | 5.71x | 11.79x | 12.22x | -1.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.95x | 3.78x | 11.08x | 9.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.57x | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.67x | 2.38x | 8.82x | 6.43x | 2.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.16x | 0.96x | 0.58x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.64x | 3.50x | 2.92x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.48x | 10.16x | 7.34x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LDOS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LDOS delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CNDT. SAIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXC scores 8/9 vs UIS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.5% | +27.1% | +23.7% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | +0.1% | +9.4% | +6.8% | -7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.7% | +8.1% | +17.1% | +14.2% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +7.6% | +21.0% | +12.5% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.30x | 1.19x | 0.14x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $389M | $2.8B | $4.7B | $35M | $556M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $1.8B | $1.2B | $182M | $233M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803M | $4.5B | $5.9B | $217M | $789M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | 2.45x | 9.91x | 3.99x | -1.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LDOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LDOS five years ago would be worth $13,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,278 for UIS. Over the past 12 months, CNDT leads with a -7.6% total return vs UIS's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LDOS at 19.8% vs DXC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -14.8% | -28.2% | -6.3% | -3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.7% | -22.4% | -14.1% | -20.9% | -7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -46.7% | +71.9% | -0.8% | -36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -65.2% | +33.4% | +12.4% | -75.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | -48.8% | +223.8% | +104.4% | -88.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | -18.9% | +19.8% | -0.3% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SAIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UIS's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIC currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs UIS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.44x | 0.42x | 0.26x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $17.26 | $205.77 | $124.11 | $2.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.97 | $11.07 | $129.35 | $81.08 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.3% | +69.5% | +63.8% | +75.8% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 42.6 | 24.5 | 46.3 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 672K | 2.9M | 1.0M | 563K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LDOS and CNDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UIS as "Hold", DXC as "Hold", LDOS as "Buy", SAIC as "Hold", CNDT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for UIS (target: $7) vs 3.6% for SAIC (target: $98). For income investors, CNDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs LDOS's 1.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $13.00 | $204.00 | $97.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 24 | 27 | 18 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | +1.6% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.59 | $1.51 | $0.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +5.7% | +10.5% | +10.2% |
LDOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SAIC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
UIS vs DXC vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CNDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). DXC Technology Company (DXC) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
On trailing P/E, DXC Technology Company (DXC) is the cheapest at 5.
7x versus Science Applications International Corporation at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, DXC Technology Company is actually cheaper at 3. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 54x versus Science Applications International Corporation's 0. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
Over the past 5 years, Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) delivered a total return of +33. 4%, compared to -87. 2% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LDOS returned +223. 8% versus CNDT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning UIS is approximately 786% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 130% for DXC Technology Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DXC Technology Company grew EPS 356. 5% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, LDOS leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LDOS leads at 12. 3% versus 4. 5% for CNDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UIS leads at 28. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus Science Applications International Corporation's 0. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, DXC Technology Company (DXC) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for Leidos Holdings, Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UIS: 113. 1% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT?
In this comparison, CNDT (3.
4% yield), SAIC (1. 6% yield), LDOS (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. UIS, DXC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UIS or DXC or LDOS or SAIC or CNDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), 1. 6% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 4%, UIS: -58. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UIS and DXC and LDOS and SAIC and CNDT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXC is a small-cap deep-value stock; LDOS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LDOS, SAIC, CNDT pay a dividend while UIS, DXC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.