Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $426M | $9.83B | $4.67B | $274M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $78M | $300K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-957M | $-618M | $-245M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 11.2% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -224.6% | -10.2% | -2431.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $61M | $42M | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $241M | $1.02B | $70M |
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unusual Machines, I… (UMAC) | 100 | 475.4 | +375.4% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 177.8 | +77.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| Vertical Aerospace … (EVTL) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UMAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 345.5% 10Y total return vs JOBY's -4.8%
- +162.6% vs EVTL's -35.0%
- -21.0% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7%
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 2.70
- Rev growth 391.8%, EPS growth -29.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EVTL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.70 vs EVTL's 3.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.6% vs EVTL's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -21.0% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7% |
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UMAC leads in 4 of 6 categories
JOBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • EVTL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UMAC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOBY and EVTL operate at a comparable scale, with $78M and $0 in trailing revenue. UMAC is the more profitable business, keeping -171.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $78M | $300,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$759M | -$709M | -$146M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$957M | -$618M | -$245M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | -$661M | -$512M | -$97M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +11.2% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -10.2% | -2431.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -171.4% | -12.3% | -2060.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -8.5% | -1705.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.5% | -9.1% | +43.5% | -106.9% |
Valuation Metrics
UMAC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $426M | $9.8B | $4.7B | $274M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $326M | $9.6B | $3.7B | $439M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.24x | -8.85x | -6.34x | -3.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 38.05x | 183.94x | 9999.00x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.01x | 5.86x | 1.78x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UMAC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UMAC delivers a -22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-22 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. UMAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JOBY's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs EVTL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.1% | -74.2% | -37.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | -52.1% | -32.9% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.6% | -54.7% | -89.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.8% | -49.8% | -44.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$101M | -$180M | -$979M | $121M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $241M | $1.0B | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $61M | $42M | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -42.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UMAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UMAC five years ago would be worth $44,554 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $273 for EVTL. Over the past 12 months, UMAC leads with a +162.6% total return vs EVTL's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMAC at 64.5% vs EVTL's -46.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | -30.4% | -22.8% | -54.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.6% | +55.7% | -26.6% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +345.5% | +128.7% | +193.5% | -84.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +345.5% | +1.0% | -36.3% | -97.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +345.5% | -4.8% | -37.0% | -97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +64.5% | +31.8% | +43.2% | -46.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UMAC and JOBY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOBY is the less volatile stock with a 2.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVTL's 3.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMAC currently trades 57.7% from its 52-week high vs EVTL's 35.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 2.70x | 2.96x | 3.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.38 | $20.95 | $14.62 | $7.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.67 | $6.32 | $4.80 | $1.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +47.7% | +43.0% | +35.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 65.5 | 61.5 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 24.7M | 27.6M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UMAC as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy", EVTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 310.4% upside for EVTL (target: $11) vs 48.1% for UMAC (target: $20).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $15.90 | $12.33 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UMAC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
UMAC vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 101. 2% for Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC). Analysts rate Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL?
Over the past 5 years, Unusual Machines, Inc.
(UMAC) delivered a total return of +345. 5%, compared to -97. 3% for Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UMAC returned +345. 5% versus EVTL's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 70β versus Vertical Aerospace Ltd. 's 3. 45β — meaning EVTL is approximately 28% more volatile than JOBY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for Joby Aviation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 101. 2% for Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertical Aerospace Ltd. grew EPS 98. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL?
Vertical Aerospace Ltd.
(EVTL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTL leads at 0. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UMAC leads at 34. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UMAC or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Unusual Machines, Inc.
(UMAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+345. 5% 10Y return). Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL) carries a higher beta of 3. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMAC: +345. 5%, EVTL: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UMAC and JOBY and ACHR and EVTL?
These companies operate in different sectors (UMAC (Financial Services) and JOBY (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials) and EVTL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UMAC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.