Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
URGN vs PAHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
URGN vs PAHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $1.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $92M |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -77.0% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $128M | $762M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $68M |
URGN vs PAHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 164.7 | +64.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URGN vs PAHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URGN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +162.7% vs PAHC's +125.1%
PAHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 128.6% 10Y total return vs URGN's 90.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs URGN's 21.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs URGN's -94.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs URGN's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.7% vs PAHC's +125.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs URGN's -62.8% |
URGN vs PAHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
URGN vs PAHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 10.4x URGN's $140M. PAHC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to URGN's -94.8%. On growth, URGN holds the edge at +151.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | $220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | $92M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$166M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.0% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -118.2% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +151.6% | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | +7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — URGN and PAHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.34x | 36.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.79x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 41.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAHC scores 5/9 vs URGN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $694M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $762M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.86x | 3.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAHC five years ago would be worth $16,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,594 for URGN. Over the past 12 months, URGN leads with a +162.7% total return vs PAHC's +125.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs URGN's 28.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.7% | +125.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.3% | +210.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.2% | +128.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.9% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — URGN and PAHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAHC is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than URGN's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URGN currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs PAHC's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $60.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.42 | $19.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 863K | 302K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates URGN as "Buy" and PAHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.4% upside for URGN (target: $40) vs 13.5% for PAHC (target: $49). PAHC is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $49.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PAHC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
URGN vs PAHC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URGN or PAHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger pick with 27.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 4% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN). Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — URGN or PAHC?
Over the past 5 years, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) delivered a total return of +66.
0%, compared to +45. 9% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAHC returned +128. 6% versus URGN's +90. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — URGN or PAHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus UroGen Pharma Ltd. 's 1. 88β — meaning URGN is approximately 37% more volatile than PAHC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — URGN or PAHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is pulling ahead at 27.
4% versus 21. 4% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -7. 8% for UroGen Pharma Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URGN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — URGN or PAHC?
Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
7% net margin versus -139. 8% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAHC leads at 8. 5% versus -113. 7% for URGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — URGN leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is URGN or PAHC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for URGN: 50.
4% to $40. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — URGN or PAHC?
In this comparison, PAHC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. URGN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is URGN or PAHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +128. 6% 10Y return). UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAHC: +128. 6%, URGN: +90. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between URGN and PAHC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PAHC pays a dividend while URGN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.