Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Staffing & Employment Services
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Staffing & Employment Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $59.14B | $277M | $3.64B | $790M | $13.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.36B | $98M | $403M | $1.33B | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.51B | $-12M | $148M | $35M | $632M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 12.6% | 61.3% | 27.2% | 85.5% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 6.1% | 48.5% | 3.8% | 64.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | — | 22.2x | 18.0x | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $16.48B | $508M | $1.16B | $70M | $4.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $459M | $25M | $20M | $2M | $27M |
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Omega Healthcare In… (OHI) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.9%
- PEG 0.78 vs OHI's 1.00
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 22.2x)
- +46.0% vs BRT's +2.7%
BRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%
Among these 5 stocks, NHI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs URI's 1.19, lower leverage
OHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- 14.0% FFO/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 51.0% margin vs BRT's -12.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% FFO/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.0% margin vs BRT's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs URI's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs BRT's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs BRT's -1.7%, ROIC 19.1% vs 1.3% |
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OHI leads in 2 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • URI leads 1 • BRT leads 0 • NHI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 167.0x BRT's $98M. OHI is the more profitable business, keeping 51.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRT's -12.5%. On growth, NHI holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.4B | $98M | $403M | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.5B | $33M | $282M | $56M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | -$12M | $148M | $35M | $632M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $16M | $226M | $43M | $912M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +12.6% | +61.3% | +27.2% | +85.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +6.1% | +48.5% | +3.8% | +64.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -12.5% | +36.8% | +2.6% | +51.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +16.2% | +56.1% | +3.3% | +73.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +4.2% | +29.7% | +0.1% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -16.7% | +10.8% | +2.2% | +42.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — URI and BRT and KFRC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 11% valuation discount to NHI's 24.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs OHI's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59.1B | $277M | $3.6B | $790M | $13.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75.2B | $760M | $4.8B | $858M | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.45x | -22.31x | 24.85x | 22.05x | 23.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.14x | — | 22.17x | 17.96x | 23.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | — | — | 1.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 20.32x | 17.16x | 15.42x | 16.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.67x | 2.86x | 9.61x | 0.59x | 11.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.80x | 1.50x | 2.29x | 6.17x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 89.34x | 25.60x | 16.52x | 16.88x | 15.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-7 for BRT. KFRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHI scores 6/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -6.8% | +9.8% | +27.2% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | -1.7% | +5.4% | +9.2% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +1.3% | +5.6% | +19.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +1.6% | +8.0% | +20.1% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 2.87x | 0.76x | 0.56x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.0B | $483M | $1.1B | $68M | $4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $459M | $25M | $20M | $2M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.5B | $508M | $1.2B | $70M | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.72x | 0.51x | 3.45x | — | 3.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,325 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +46.0% total return vs BRT's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +3.5% | -1.1% | +39.2% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.0% | +2.7% | +2.8% | +18.9% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.8% | +1.0% | +73.5% | -13.8% | +86.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.0% | +7.5% | +31.0% | -16.8% | +63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1482.5% | +217.9% | +58.9% | +195.5% | +110.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.4% | +0.3% | +20.2% | -4.8% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
OHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than URI's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OHI currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs NHI's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.65x | -0.08x | 0.53x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1021.47 | $16.69 | $90.94 | $47.48 | $49.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $647.05 | $13.18 | $68.80 | $24.49 | $35.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +88.2% | +82.5% | +91.0% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 56.6 | 28.0 | 65.6 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 557K | 54K | 332K | 305K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BRT and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URI as "Buy", BRT as "Buy", NHI as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", OHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 6.5% for OHI (target: $49). For income investors, BRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.13% vs URI's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1037.13 | $21.00 | $85.40 | $71.00 | $49.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 5 | 18 | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +7.1% | +4.8% | +3.6% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.18 | $1.05 | $3.61 | $1.55 | $2.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +6.4% | 0.0% |
OHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). KFRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
URI vs BRT vs NHI vs KFRC vs OHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Rentals, Inc. (URI) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus National Health Investors, Inc. at 24. 9x. On forward P/E, Kforce Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -16. 8% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus NHI's +58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus United Rentals, Inc. 's 1. 19β — meaning URI is approximately -1026% more volatile than OHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kforce Inc. (KFRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 9% for BRT Apartments Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -12. 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OHI leads at 62. 6% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OHI leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kforce Inc. (KFRC) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 0. 8% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI).
09Is URI or BRT or NHI or KFRC or OHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
(OHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13), 5. 4% yield, +110. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OHI: +110. 0%, BRT: +217. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between URI and BRT and NHI and KFRC and OHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (URI (Industrials) and BRT (Real Estate) and NHI (Real Estate) and KFRC (Industrials) and OHI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OHI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.