Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USAR
USA Rare Earth Inc

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$602M
5Y Perf.+353.9%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+105.5%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.98B
5Y Perf.+176.2%
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$803M
5Y Perf.+209.4%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.00B
5Y Perf.+182.6%

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USAR logoUSAR
LAC logoLAC
MP logoMP
SLI logoSLI
ALB logoALB
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$602M$1.35B$11.98B$803M$24.00B
Revenue (TTM)$22M$0.00$305M$0.00$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-246M$-241M$-71M$-48M$-233M
Gross Margin80.9%8.3%18.5%
Operating Margin53.6%-40.9%5.6%
Forward P/E69.1x254.2x19.4x
Total Debt$0.00$23M$1.04B$477K$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$2K$594M$1.17B$32M$1.62B

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USAR
LAC
MP
SLI
ALB
StockMar 25May 26Return
USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR)100453.9+353.9%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100205.5+105.5%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100276.2+176.2%
Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI)100309.4+209.4%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100282.6+182.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. MP Materials Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. USAR and LAC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USAR
USA Rare Earth Inc
The Income Pick

USAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALB's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: dividends
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
  • 1.4% margin vs USAR's -77.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Growth Play

MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs ALB's 224.7%
  • Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.24x
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SLI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Income Pick

ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 0.8%
  • Better valuation composite
  • +257.1% vs LAC's +77.4%
  • -1.4% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -2.3%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
ValueALB logoALBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLAC logoLAC1.4% margin vs USAR's -77.4%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.44 vs USAR's 2.23
DividendsUSAR logoUSAR2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALB's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+257.1% vs LAC's +77.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ALB logoALB-1.4% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -2.3%

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

USARUSA Rare Earth Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
SLIStandard Lithium Ltd.
FY 2016
SLPE
35.4%$71M
High Power Group
34.8%$70M
SLMTI
29.8%$60M
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALBLAGGINGSLI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALB is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAR's -77.4%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$22M$0$305M$0$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$170M-$32M-$24M$28M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$246M-$241M-$71M-$48M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$154M-$648M-$314M-$18M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+80.9%+8.3%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+53.6%-40.9%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-77.4%-23.3%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+48.3%-102.8%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.1%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.0%-21.4%+71.4%
USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$602M$1.4B$12.0B$803M$24.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$602M$780M$11.9B$771M$25.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS69.13x-26.52x-134.86x-13.10x-35.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.254.17x19.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple34.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue43.49x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share24.93x1.18x4.80x3.20x2.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.66x
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

USAR delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LAC. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MP's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.5%-26.9%-3.7%-17.8%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-162.9%-16.6%-2.0%-15.9%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.3%-7.1%-4.7%-11.2%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.9%-3.9%-4.2%-10.7%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932436
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.44x0.00x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2,101-$571M-$123M-$31M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2,101$594M$1.2B$32M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$23M$1.0B$476,715$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1572.30x-2.80x-1559.24x1.59x
ALB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MP five years ago would be worth $25,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,114 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +257.1% total return vs LAC's +77.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 46.4% vs LAC's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+90.5%+16.8%+22.7%-17.8%+41.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+169.6%+77.4%+182.7%+172.9%+257.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+147.1%-56.3%+213.8%+17.7%+12.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+147.1%-28.9%+154.6%+21.3%+32.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+147.1%+229.6%+574.3%+222.1%+224.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.2%-24.1%+46.4%+5.6%+3.9%
MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAR's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs LAC's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.23x1.51x1.44x1.62x1.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$43.98$10.52$100.25$6.40$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.00$2.47$18.64$1.41$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.3%+52.9%+67.3%+61.4%+92.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.761.760.153.356.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15.1M9.1M5.7M1.8M2.0M
Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — USAR and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: USAR as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", MP as "Buy", SLI as "Buy", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.9% upside for USAR (target: $34) vs -3.5% for ALB (target: $196). For income investors, USAR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs ALB's 0.80%.

MetricUSAR logoUSARUSA Rare Earth IncLAC logoLACLithium Americas …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.20$7.00$81.00$4.75$196.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts31512345
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.54$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — USAR and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ALB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). USAR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlbemarle Corporation (ALB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) offers the better valuation at 69. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

On forward P/E, Albemarle Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) delivered a total return of +154. 6%, compared to -28. 9% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MP returned +574. 3% versus USAR's +147. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus USA Rare Earth Inc's 2. 23β — meaning USAR is approximately 55% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for MP Materials Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALB leads at -11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

Lithium Americas Corp.

(LAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -77. 4% for USA Rare Earth Inc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAR leads at 53. 6% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAR leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 19.

4x forward P/E versus 254. 2x for MP Materials Corp. — 234. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAR: 26. 9% to $34. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?

In this comparison, USAR (2.

0% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LAC, MP, SLI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +224. 7%, SLI: +222. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USAR and LAC and MP and SLI and ALB?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: USAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. USAR, ALB pay a dividend while LAC, MP, SLI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

USAR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 48%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.