Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Industrial Materials
Industrial Materials
Chemicals - Specialty
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $602M | $1.35B | $11.98B | $803M | $24.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $0.00 | $305M | $0.00 | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-246M | $-241M | $-71M | $-48M | $-233M |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | — | 8.3% | — | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 53.6% | — | -40.9% | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 69.1x | — | 254.2x | — | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $23M | $1.04B | $477K | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $594M | $1.17B | $32M | $1.62B |
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) | 100 | 453.9 | +353.9% |
| Lithium Americas Co… (LAC) | 100 | 205.5 | +105.5% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 276.2 | +176.2% |
| Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI) | 100 | 309.4 | +209.4% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 282.6 | +182.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALB's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
- 1.4% margin vs USAR's -77.4%
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs ALB's 224.7%
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SLI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 0.8%
- Better valuation composite
- +257.1% vs LAC's +77.4%
- -1.4% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs USAR's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.44 vs USAR's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALB's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +257.1% vs LAC's +77.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -2.3% |
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALB leads in 2 of 6 categories
USAR leads 1 • MP leads 1 • LAC leads 0 • SLI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALB is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAR's -77.4%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $0 | $305M | $0 | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $170M | -$32M | -$24M | $28M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$246M | -$241M | -$71M | -$48M | -$233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | -$648M | -$314M | -$18M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | — | +8.3% | — | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | — | -40.9% | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | — | -23.3% | — | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | — | -102.8% | — | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +49.1% | — | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | -21.4% | +71.4% | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $602M | $1.4B | $12.0B | $803M | $24.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $602M | $780M | $11.9B | $771M | $25.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.13x | -26.52x | -134.86x | -13.10x | -35.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 254.17x | — | 19.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 34.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 43.49x | — | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.93x | 1.18x | 4.80x | 3.20x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 34.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USAR delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LAC. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MP's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | -26.9% | -3.7% | -17.8% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -162.9% | -16.6% | -2.0% | -15.9% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | -7.1% | -4.7% | -11.2% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -3.9% | -4.2% | -10.7% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.44x | 0.00x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2,101 | -$571M | -$123M | -$31M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,101 | $594M | $1.2B | $32M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $23M | $1.0B | $476,715 | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1572.30x | — | -2.80x | -1559.24x | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MP five years ago would be worth $25,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,114 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +257.1% total return vs LAC's +77.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 46.4% vs LAC's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +90.5% | +16.8% | +22.7% | -17.8% | +41.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +169.6% | +77.4% | +182.7% | +172.9% | +257.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | -56.3% | +213.8% | +17.7% | +12.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | -28.9% | +154.6% | +21.3% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | +229.6% | +574.3% | +222.1% | +224.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.2% | -24.1% | +46.4% | +5.6% | +3.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MP and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAR's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs LAC's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 1.51x | 1.44x | 1.62x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $10.52 | $100.25 | $6.40 | $221.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $2.47 | $18.64 | $1.41 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +52.9% | +67.3% | +61.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 61.7 | 60.1 | 53.3 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.1M | 9.1M | 5.7M | 1.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USAR and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USAR as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", MP as "Buy", SLI as "Buy", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.9% upside for USAR (target: $34) vs -3.5% for ALB (target: $196). For income investors, USAR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs ALB's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.20 | $7.00 | $81.00 | $4.75 | $196.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | — | — | — | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). USAR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
USAR vs LAC vs MP vs SLI vs ALB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) offers the better valuation at 69. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
On forward P/E, Albemarle Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) delivered a total return of +154. 6%, compared to -28. 9% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MP returned +574. 3% versus USAR's +147. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus USA Rare Earth Inc's 2. 23β — meaning USAR is approximately 55% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for MP Materials Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALB leads at -11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
Lithium Americas Corp.
(LAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -77. 4% for USA Rare Earth Inc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAR leads at 53. 6% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAR leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 254. 2x for MP Materials Corp. — 234. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAR: 26. 9% to $34. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB?
In this comparison, USAR (2.
0% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LAC, MP, SLI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USAR or LAC or MP or SLI or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +224. 7%, SLI: +222. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAR and LAC and MP and SLI and ALB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. USAR, ALB pay a dividend while LAC, MP, SLI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.