Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USAR vs MP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
USAR vs MP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $638M | $12.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $275M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-246M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 53.6% | -53.0% |
| Forward P/E | 73.3x | 288.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $1.17B |
USAR vs MP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) | 100 | 481.5 | +381.5% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 297.6 | +197.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAR vs MP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 39.3%
- Lower P/E (73.3x vs 288.3x)
- 1.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
MP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.40
- 6.3% 10Y total return vs USAR's 162.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs USAR's -64.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (73.3x vs 288.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -31.2% margin vs USAR's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs USAR's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +194.2% vs USAR's +178.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.7% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC -4.7% vs -2.3% |
USAR vs MP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USAR vs MP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MP is the larger business by revenue, generating $275M annually — 12.8x USAR's $22M. MP is the more profitable business, keeping -31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAR's -77.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $275M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $170M | -$56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$246M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | -$328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | -53.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | -31.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | -119.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +70.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +133.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $638M | $12.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $638M | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 73.33x | -145.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 288.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 46.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.45x | 5.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — USAR and MP each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USAR delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MP. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MP scores 4/9 vs USAR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | -5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -162.9% | -2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | -4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2,101 | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,101 | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1572.30x | -2.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USAR five years ago would be worth $26,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,787 for MP. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +194.2% total return vs USAR's +178.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 50.1% vs USAR's 37.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +102.1% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.2% | +194.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.1% | +238.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.1% | +147.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.1% | +626.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.9% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAR's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MP currently trades 72.5% from its 52-week high vs USAR's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $100.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $18.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.9M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USAR as "Buy" and MP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for USAR (target: $34) vs 7.7% for MP (target: $78). USAR is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.20 | $78.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). USAR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
USAR vs MP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAR or MP a better buy right now?
USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) offers the better valuation at 73.
3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — USAR or MP?
Over the past 5 years, USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) delivered a total return of +162.
1%, compared to +147. 9% for MP Materials Corp. (MP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MP returned +626. 5% versus USAR's +162. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — USAR or MP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus USA Rare Earth Inc's 2. 18β — meaning USAR is approximately 56% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — USAR or MP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: USA Rare Earth Inc grew EPS 39.
3% year-over-year, compared to 12. 3% for MP Materials Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — USAR or MP?
MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the more profitable company, earning -31. 2% net margin versus -77. 4% for USA Rare Earth Inc — meaning it keeps -31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAR leads at 53. 6% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAR leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is USAR or MP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAR: 19.
6% to $34. 20.
07Which pays a better dividend — USAR or MP?
In this comparison, USAR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is USAR or MP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+626. 5% 10Y return). USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MP: +626. 5%, USAR: +162. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between USAR and MP?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. USAR pays a dividend while MP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.