Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
USCB logo
USCB
CZNC logo
CZNC
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
OCFC logo
OCFC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$357M
5Y Perf.+83.6%
CZNC
Citizens & Northern Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$395M
5Y Perf.-10.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+111.3%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-73.7%
OCFC
OceanFirst Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.07B
5Y Perf.-4.6%

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USCB logoUSCB
CZNC logoCZNC
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
OCFC logoOCFC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$357M$395M$896.00B$20.26B$1.07B
Revenue (TTM)$152M$165M$280.33B$11.66B$660M
Net Income (TTM)$26M$17M$57.05B$2.67B$71M
Gross Margin58.1%59.4%60.0%37.6%54.8%
Operating Margin23.6%12.9%25.9%17.9%14.0%
Forward P/E9.8x11.2x14.4x6.2x9.7x
Total Debt$91M$193M$942.38B$4.01B$1.63B
Cash & Equiv.$82M$46M$343.34B$599M$135M

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USCB
CZNC
JPM
FIS
OCFC
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
USCB Financial Hold… (USCB)100183.6+83.6%
Citizens & Northern… (CZNC)10089.3-10.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100211.3+111.3%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10026.3-73.7%
OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC)10095.4-4.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CZNC and FIS are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. USCB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

USCB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth 4.8%
  • NIM 3.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 5.6% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
CZNC
Citizens & Northern Corporation
The Banking Pick

CZNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 56.5%, current ratio 1.11x
  • Beta 0.47, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.11x
  • Beta 0.47 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs USCB's 88.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.26 vs CZNC's 4.47
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
  • 22.9% margin vs CZNC's 10.5%
  • 7.5% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency
OCFC
OceanFirst Financial Corp.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, OCFC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUSCB logoUSCB5.6% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CZNC's 10.5%
Stability / SafetyCZNC logoCZNCBeta 0.47 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsCZNC logoCZNC4.6% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)CZNC logoCZNC+23.0% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.2%

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
USCBUSCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CZNCCitizens & Northern Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
53.2%$6M
Debit Card
41.1%$5M
Bank Servicing
5.7%$643,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
OCFCOceanFirst Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
92.2%$18M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
7.8%$2M

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGOCFC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1843.3x USCB's $152M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZNC's 10.5%.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$152M$165M$280.3B$11.7B$660M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$36M$22M$81.4B$4.1B$103M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$26M$17M$57.0B$2.7B$71M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$36M$100.9B$2.8B$80M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+59.4%+60.0%+37.6%+54.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.6%+12.9%+25.9%+17.9%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.2%+10.5%+20.4%+22.9%+10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.9%+22.0%+36.0%+23.9%+12.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-79.4%-96.2%+16.0%+30.6%-36.1%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.0x trailing earnings, USCB trades at a 71% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USCB offers better value at 0.58x vs CZNC's 6.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
Market CapShares × price$357M$395M$896.0B$20.3B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$365M$542M$1.50T$23.7B$2.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.04x15.11x16.00x52.27x15.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.76x11.20x14.40x6.24x9.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.58x6.03x0.90x2.14x5.71x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.04x18.93x18.36x6.50x27.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.35x2.56x3.20x1.90x1.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.69x1.03x2.47x1.46x0.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.40x13.13x8.88x7.21x13.43x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — USCB and FIS each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USCB scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+5.5%+15.9%+18.4%+4.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.6%+1.3%+7.5%+0.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.8%+4.2%+4.5%+6.0%+2.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.8%+1.6%+8.9%+6.6%+2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.56x2.60x0.29x0.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M$147M$599.0B$3.4B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$82M$46M$343.3B$599M$135M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$91M$193M$942.4B$4.0B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.58x0.45x0.74x21.16x0.33x
Evenly matched — USCB and FIS each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZNC leads with a +23.0% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.8%+13.3%-0.5%-38.9%+6.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.6%+23.0%+21.8%-49.4%+12.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.7%+23.3%+138.2%-18.9%+28.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.5%+11.1%+118.2%-67.3%+3.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.5%+62.1%+465.8%-25.6%+37.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.5%+7.2%+33.6%-6.8%+8.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CZNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x0.47x0.94x0.61x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.79$24.11$337.25$82.74$20.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.57$18.16$262.71$37.91$16.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.1%+91.5%+95.1%+47.4%+90.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.257.359.130.850.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded58K39K7.0M5.6M776K
Evenly matched — CZNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CZNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: USCB as "Buy", CZNC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", OCFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 2.2% for OCFC (target: $19). For income investors, CZNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.63% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…CZNC logoCZNCCitizens & Northe…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…OCFC logoOCFCOceanFirst Financ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$23.50$339.75$62.88$19.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3161378
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%+4.6%+1.9%+4.2%+4.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises201510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.43$1.02$5.95$1.63$0.84
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.7%+0.1%+3.9%+7.0%+7.7%
Evenly matched — CZNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USCB vs CZNC vs JPM vs FIS vs OCFC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

(USCB) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

On trailing P/E, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

(USCB) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation's 4. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

47β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 99% more volatile than CZNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

(USCB) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 14. 1% for OCFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CZNC leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens & Northern Corporation's 4. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is USCB or CZNC or JPM or FIS or OCFC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZNC: +62. 1%, OCFC: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USCB and CZNC and JPM and FIS and OCFC?

These companies operate in different sectors (USCB (Financial Services) and CZNC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and OCFC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: USCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.