Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $357M | $395M | $1.07B | $273M | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $152M | $165M | $660M | $115M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $17M | $71M | $18M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 59.4% | 54.8% | 74.7% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 12.9% | 14.0% | 19.0% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 11.2x | 9.7x | 12.8x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $91M | $193M | $1.63B | $43M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $82M | $46M | $135M | $161M | $599M |
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USCB Financial Hold… (USCB) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
| Citizens & Northern… (CZNC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 95.4 | -4.6% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 142.1 | +42.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 26.3 | -73.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USCB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CZNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 56.5%, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta 0.47, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta 0.47 vs OCFC's 0.89, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, OCFC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs USCB's 88.5%
- NIM 3.6% vs OCFC's 2.5%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs FXNC's 8.59
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 8.59
- 22.9% margin vs CZNC's 10.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 12.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 8.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs CZNC's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs OCFC's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs FXNC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.2% |
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • USCB leads 0 • CZNC leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — USCB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 101.1x FXNC's $115M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZNC's 10.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $152M | $165M | $660M | $115M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $22M | $103M | $25M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $17M | $71M | $18M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $36M | $80M | $21M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.1% | +59.4% | +54.8% | +74.7% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +12.9% | +14.0% | +19.0% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +10.5% | +10.7% | +15.4% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +22.0% | +12.0% | +18.2% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.4% | -96.2% | -36.1% | +7.1% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, USCB trades at a 71% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USCB offers better value at 0.58x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $357M | $395M | $1.1B | $273M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $365M | $542M | $2.6B | $155M | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.04x | 15.11x | 15.90x | 15.40x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.76x | 11.20x | 9.69x | 12.82x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.58x | 6.03x | 5.71x | 10.32x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.04x | 18.93x | 27.52x | 7.05x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 2.56x | 1.63x | 2.43x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 1.03x | 0.64x | 1.46x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.40x | 13.13x | 13.43x | 12.99x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OCFC's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs CZNC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +5.5% | +4.3% | +10.0% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.6% | +0.5% | +0.9% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +4.2% | +2.2% | +7.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +1.6% | +2.7% | +9.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.56x | 0.98x | 0.23x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $147M | $1.5B | -$118M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $82M | $46M | $135M | $161M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91M | $193M | $1.6B | $43M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.45x | 0.33x | 0.84x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USCB five years ago would be worth $18,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 26.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +13.3% | +6.5% | +24.4% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +23.0% | +12.2% | +57.8% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.7% | +23.3% | +28.0% | +103.7% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.5% | +11.1% | +3.9% | +71.0% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.5% | +62.1% | +37.0% | +258.5% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +7.2% | +8.6% | +26.8% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZNC and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.47x | 0.89x | 0.52x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.79 | $24.11 | $20.61 | $30.51 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.57 | $18.16 | $16.09 | $18.31 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.1% | +91.5% | +90.2% | +99.0% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 57.3 | 50.1 | 67.0 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 39K | 776K | 79K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZNC and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USCB as "Buy", CZNC as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, CZNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.63% vs FXNC's 2.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $23.50 | $19.00 | $21.00 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +2.0% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $1.02 | $0.84 | $0.61 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.7% | +0.1% | +7.7% | +0.1% | +7.0% |
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
USCB vs CZNC vs OCFC vs FXNC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
(USCB) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
(USCB) delivered a total return of +88. 5%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 0. 89β — meaning OCFC is approximately 88% more volatile than CZNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 98% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
(USCB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USCB leads at 23. 6% versus 14. 1% for OCFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for First National Corporation — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens & Northern Corporation (CZNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 2. 0% for First National Corporation (FXNC).
09Is USCB or CZNC or OCFC or FXNC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, OCFC: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USCB and CZNC and OCFC and FXNC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (USCB (Financial Services) and CZNC (Financial Services) and OCFC (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: USCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.