Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $33M | $693M | $6.90B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.90B | $3.36B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-1.31B | $483M | $638M |
| Gross Margin | -23.0% | 44.2% | 102.0% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -106.9% | -58.3% | 26.3% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.0x | 7.7x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.55B | $3.55B | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429K | $40M | $79M | $76M |
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Energy Corp. (USEG) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 708.8 | +608.8% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USEG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 7.7x)
MTDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.4%
- 201.8% 10Y total return vs CIVI's -86.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 59.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.79x
CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs USEG's -64.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs USEG's -29.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -35.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs USEG's -64.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 7.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs USEG's -213.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs VTLE's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs USEG's -12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs USEG's -29.9%, ROIC 10.8% vs -35.7% |
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • MTDR leads 1 • USEG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MTDR and CIVI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 695.8x USEG's $7M. MTDR is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USEG's -2.1%. On growth, CIVI holds the edge at -8.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.9B | $3.4B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$334M | $2.1B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$1.3B | $483M | $638M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $656M | $518M | $934M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -23.0% | +44.2% | +102.0% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -106.9% | -58.3% | +26.3% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -69.3% | +14.4% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +34.6% | +15.4% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.9% | -8.4% | -33.2% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | -2.6% | -115.1% | -33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 65% valuation discount to MTDR's 9.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VTLE's 4.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $693M | $6.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $3.2B | $10.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.25x | -3.78x | 9.12x | 3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.98x | 7.72x | 6.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.46x | 4.34x | 1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 0.36x | 1.89x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 0.24x | 1.15x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 28.57x | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. USEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIVI scores 5/9 vs USEG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.0% | -74.8% | +8.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.9% | -27.9% | +4.1% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.7% | -0.3% | +10.5% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.7% | -0.5% | +11.5% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.59x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $2.5B | $3.5B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429,000 | $40M | $79M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.6B | $3.5B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -74.04x | -5.04x | 7.88x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTDR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTDR five years ago would be worth $20,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,477 for USEG. Over the past 12 months, MTDR leads with a +42.2% total return vs USEG's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTDR at 9.1% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | — | +29.0% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.0% | +28.7% | +42.2% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -59.0% | +29.9% | -41.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.2% | -51.9% | +105.5% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -92.1% | +201.8% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | -25.7% | +9.1% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USEG and MTDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USEG is the less volatile stock with a -1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTDR currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs USEG's 35.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.13x | 1.32x | 0.06x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $22.10 | $66.84 | $37.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $13.65 | $37.14 | $25.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.2% | +81.1% | +83.1% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 53.2 | 43.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.8M | 17 | 1.8M | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MTDR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VTLE as "Hold", MTDR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for VTLE (target: $23) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs MTDR's 2.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.00 | $68.29 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 42 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.4% | +18.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.31 | $4.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.8% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +18.3% |
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CIVI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
USEG vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -64. 3% for U. S. Energy Corp. (USEG). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matador Resources Company (MTDR) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Matador Resources Company at 9. 1x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
Over the past 5 years, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) delivered a total return of +105.
5%, compared to -75. 2% for U. S. Energy Corp. (USEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +201. 8% versus USEG's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.
S. Energy Corp. (USEG) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 13β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately -217% more volatile than USEG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Energy Corp. (USEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -64. 3% for U. S. Energy Corp. (USEG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Energy Corp. grew EPS 55. 2% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
8% net margin versus -195. 5% for U. S. Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTDR leads at 32. 5% versus -140. 4% for USEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Matador Resources Company — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), MTDR (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. USEG, VTLE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USEG or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U.
S. Energy Corp. (USEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 13)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (USEG: -95. 3%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USEG and VTLE and MTDR and CIVI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USEG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. MTDR, CIVI pay a dividend while USEG, VTLE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.