Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USFD vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
USFD vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $19.16B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.68B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $677M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.72B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $10.73B |
USFD vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 453.9 | +353.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USFD vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USFD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (18.2x vs 44.7x)
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs USFD's 248.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs USFD's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs USFD's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs USFD's 0.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs USFD's +25.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs USFD's 4.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs 9.3% |
USFD vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USFD vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 17.7x USFD's $39.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (WMT) to 1.7% (USFD). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.7B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $677M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $848M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
USFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.6x trailing earnings, USFD trades at a 38% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, USFD's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.2B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.8B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.55x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.20x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.67x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.98x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $15 for USFD. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USFD's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.3% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.0% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.7B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.94x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,415 for USFD. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs USFD's +25.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs USFD's 31.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.7% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +248.8% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.2% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USFD's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs USFD's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.13 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $66.89 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USFD as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $108.33 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). USFD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
USFD vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USFD or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) offers the better valuation at 29. 6x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USFD or WMT?
On trailing P/E, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the cheapest at 29. 6x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, US Foods Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USFD or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +114. 1% for US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus USFD's +248. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USFD or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus US Foods Holding Corp. 's 0. 50β — meaning USFD is approximately 329% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 133% for US Foods Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USFD or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 4. 1% for US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USFD or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 1. 7% for US Foods Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus 3. 1% for USFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USFD or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 26. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — USFD or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. USFD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USFD or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, USFD: +248. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USFD and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while USFD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.