Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USGO vs GLDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
USGO vs GLDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $167M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | -77.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | — |
| Total Debt | $109K | $387K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $12M |
USGO vs GLDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. GoldMining Inc. (USGO) | 100 | 146.5 | +46.5% |
| GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USGO vs GLDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USGO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.23
- 48.6% 10Y total return vs GLDG's 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 9.80x
GLDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- EPS growth 19.5%
- 0.5% margin vs USGO's -35.4%
- +48.9% vs USGO's +39.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.4% revenue growth vs GLDG's 35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.5% margin vs USGO's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs GLDG's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.9% vs USGO's +39.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.3% ROA vs USGO's -142.3%, ROIC -18.3% vs -8.2% |
USGO vs GLDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLDG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USGO and GLDG operate at a comparable scale, with $189,304 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189,304 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -77.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.1% | +104.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — USGO and GLDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $164M | $241M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.75x | -12.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 37.49x | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLDG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLDG delivers a -8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-174 for USGO. GLDG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USGO's 0.02x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -174.1% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -142.3% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -103.2% | -20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$11M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109,394 | $387,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -113.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — USGO and GLDG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USGO five years ago would be worth $14,856 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,391 for GLDG. Over the past 12 months, GLDG leads with a +48.9% total return vs USGO's +39.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLDG at 3.6% vs USGO's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.0% | -4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +48.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +11.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.6% | -26.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.6% | +6.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
USGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLDG's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USGO currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs GLDG's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.98 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.42 | $0.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USGO as "Buy" and GLDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.3% upside for GLDG (target: $3) vs 129.0% for USGO (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.75 | $2.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GLDG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). USGO leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
USGO vs GLDG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USGO or GLDG a better buy right now?
Analysts rate U.
S. GoldMining Inc. (USGO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — USGO or GLDG?
Over the past 5 years, U.
S. GoldMining Inc. (USGO) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -26. 1% for GoldMining Inc. (GLDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USGO returned +48. 6% versus GLDG's +6. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — USGO or GLDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.
S. GoldMining Inc. (USGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus GoldMining Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning GLDG is approximately 10% more volatile than USGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for U. S. GoldMining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — USGO or GLDG?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GoldMining Inc.
grew EPS 19. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 3% for U. S. GoldMining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — USGO or GLDG?
GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -35. 4% for U. S. GoldMining Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLDG leads at 0. 0% versus -36. 1% for USGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLDG leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — USGO or GLDG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is USGO or GLDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U.
S. GoldMining Inc. (USGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (USGO: +48. 6%, GLDG: +6. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between USGO and GLDG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.