Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $210M | $3.72B | $1.92B | $469M | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $1.54B | $674M | $307M | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $139M | $-173M | $-28M | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 48.7% | 75.2% | 53.7% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | 12.2% | -27.2% | -9.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 15.5x | — | — | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $225K | $898M | $290M | $0.00 | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $449M | $103M | $56M | $1.96B |
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah Medical Produc… (UTMD) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 138.5 | +38.5% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 110.4 | +10.4% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UTMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 37.62x
- Beta 0.55, yield 1.9%, current ratio 37.62x
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 17.2x)
- 29.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
MMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- 11.7% revenue growth vs UTMD's -5.8%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ANGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.41
- Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- +37.1% vs MMSI's -33.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs UTMD's -5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs MMSI's -33.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 25.0% vs -16.4% |
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UTMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
HOLX leads 1 • MMSI leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ANGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 107.1x UTMD's $39M. UTMD is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $1.5B | $674M | $307M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $290M | -$165M | -$5M | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $139M | -$173M | -$28M | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $274M | -$48M | -$9M | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +48.7% | +75.2% | +53.7% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +12.2% | -27.2% | -9.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +9.0% | -25.7% | -9.0% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +17.8% | -7.1% | -3.0% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +7.8% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | +38.8% | -100.0% | +42.3% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
UTMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, UTMD trades at a 38% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UTMD's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOLX's 17.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $3.7B | $1.9B | $469M | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $4.2B | $2.1B | $413M | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.79x | 29.26x | -13.80x | -13.58x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.41x | 15.46x | — | — | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.48x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.64x | 13.06x | — | — | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.44x | 2.45x | 2.92x | 1.60x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 2.38x | 5.51x | 2.52x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.63x | 17.24x | — | — | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UTMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLX delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. UTMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs ANGO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +8.9% | -50.8% | -15.7% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | +5.2% | -16.5% | -10.3% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.0% | +7.2% | -16.4% | -22.9% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +7.9% | -28.9% | -18.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.57x | 0.85x | — | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$86M | $450M | $187M | -$56M | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $449M | $103M | $56M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225,000 | $898M | $290M | $0 | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.74x | -96.80x | -258.19x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ANGO and HOLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs MMSI's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANGO at 7.9% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | -27.9% | +28.3% | -11.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -33.8% | +1.1% | +28.5% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | -26.5% | -75.7% | +25.8% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.2% | -3.6% | -91.3% | -53.3% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +214.6% | +30.3% | -9.2% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.7% | -9.8% | -37.6% | +7.9% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MMSI's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.71x | 2.20x | 1.32x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.81 | $100.19 | $20.06 | $13.99 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.00 | $59.74 | $9.82 | $8.36 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +62.2% | +83.9% | +80.6% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 34.9 | 69.8 | 54.0 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 769K | 1.5M | 395K | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMSI as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). UTMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | $33.50 | $16.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 15 | 11 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.4% |
UTMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOLX leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
UTMD vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD). Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Utah Medical Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus ANGO's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 437% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -5. 8% for Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTMD leads at 29. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX?
In this comparison, UTMD (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MMSI, NVCR, ANGO, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UTMD or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 9% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTMD: +19. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UTMD and MMSI and NVCR and ANGO and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
UTMD pays a dividend while MMSI, NVCR, ANGO, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.