Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $209M | $2.04B | $16.97B | $884M | $159.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $674M | $4.13B | $375M | $10.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-173M | $544M | $87M | $2.98B |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 75.2% | 52.8% | 77.8% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | -27.2% | 17.5% | 21.3% | 30.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | — | 17.2x | 10.3x | 43.3x |
| Total Debt | $225K | $290M | $2.63B | $13M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $103M | $1.96B | $303M | $3.37B |
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah Medical Produc… (UTMD) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UTMD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 37.62x
- Beta 0.55, yield 1.9%, current ratio 37.62x
- 29.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.45
- Beta 0.45 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
- +35.3% vs ISRG's -16.4%
INMD is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.04 vs UTMD's 3.03
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 43.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 1.99
ISRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2%
- 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs INMD's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 43.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.3% vs ISRG's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4% |
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
INMD leads 1 • HOLX leads 1 • UTMD leads 0 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 274.7x UTMD's $39M. UTMD is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $674M | $4.1B | $375M | $10.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$165M | $974M | $81M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$173M | $544M | $87M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$48M | $1000M | $91M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +75.2% | +52.8% | +77.8% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | -27.2% | +17.5% | +21.3% | +30.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | -25.7% | +13.2% | +23.3% | +28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | -7.1% | +24.2% | +24.2% | +26.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +12.3% | +2.5% | +5.3% | +23.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | -100.0% | -9.2% | -30.8% | +18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INMD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, INMD trades at a 83% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INMD offers better value at 0.98x vs UTMD's 5.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209M | $2.0B | $17.0B | $884M | $159.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $2.2B | $17.6B | $595M | $156.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.78x | -14.66x | 30.53x | 9.76x | 57.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.40x | — | 17.21x | 10.32x | 43.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.47x | — | — | 0.98x | 2.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.63x | — | 17.39x | 6.91x | 43.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.44x | 3.11x | 4.14x | 2.39x | 15.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 5.86x | 3.43x | 1.34x | 9.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.62x | — | 18.44x | 10.49x | 64.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. UTMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | -50.8% | +11.0% | +13.3% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | -16.5% | +6.1% | +11.8% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.0% | -16.4% | +9.4% | +13.5% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | -28.9% | +8.8% | +12.1% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.85x | 0.52x | 0.02x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$86M | $187M | $667M | -$289M | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $103M | $2.0B | $303M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225,000 | $290M | $2.6B | $13M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -96.80x | 8.00x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $16,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +35.3% total return vs ISRG's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.1% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.2% | +36.4% | +1.9% | -5.7% | -19.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.6% | +2.6% | +35.3% | -1.9% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.3% | -74.2% | -8.5% | -60.1% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.1% | -90.2% | +16.8% | -61.5% | +61.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | +38.5% | +124.3% | +105.6% | +549.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.7% | -36.4% | -2.9% | -26.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ISRG's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 2.15x | 0.45x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.81 | $20.06 | $76.04 | $16.74 | $603.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.00 | $9.82 | $53.62 | $12.72 | $427.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +89.2% | +100.0% | +83.4% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 70.9 | 69.1 | 46.6 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 1.4M | 10.3M | 815K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", INMD as "Hold", ISRG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.3% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). UTMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $79.00 | $17.00 | $622.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 42 | 11 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +14.4% | +1.4% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
UTMD vs NVCR vs HOLX vs INMD vs ISRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
On trailing P/E, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, InMode Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InMode Ltd. wins at 1. 04x versus Utah Medical Products, Inc. 's 3. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus UTMD's +19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 373% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTMD leads at 29. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InMode Ltd. (INMD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus Utah Medical Products, Inc. 's 3. 03x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd. (INMD) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 87. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG?
In this comparison, UTMD (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NVCR, HOLX, INMD, ISRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UTMD or NVCR or HOLX or INMD or ISRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Utah Medical Products, Inc.
(UTMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 9% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTMD: +19. 0%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UTMD and NVCR and HOLX and INMD and ISRG?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UTMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. UTMD pays a dividend while NVCR, HOLX, INMD, ISRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.