Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UZD vs PFLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
UZD vs PFLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.74B | $914M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $172M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 22.5x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $1.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $123M |
UZD vs PFLT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZD) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
| PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZD vs PFLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.59, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.72x
PFLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -48.6%
- 77.8% 10Y total return vs UZD's 12.3%
- PEG 0.89 vs UZD's 4.58
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs UZD's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 22.5x), PEG 0.89 vs 4.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs UZD's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs PFLT's 0.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFLT's 13.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.7% vs UZD's -9.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs PFLT's 1.3%, ROIC -0.6% vs 2.1% |
UZD vs PFLT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UZD vs PFLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UZD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UZD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 11.2x PFLT's $172M. PFLT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UZD's 15.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $172M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $100M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +55.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -110.3% |
Valuation Metrics
UZD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, UZD trades at a 53% valuation discount to PFLT's 12.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UZD offers better value at 1.23x vs PFLT's 1.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $914M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.04x | 12.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.51x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.23x | 1.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.68x | 5.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.66x | 9.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UZD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UZD delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for PFLT. UZD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $123M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 0.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFLT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFLT five years ago would be worth $11,941 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,416 for UZD. Over the past 12 months, PFLT leads with a +3.7% total return vs UZD's -9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UZD at 18.4% vs PFLT's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.2% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.9% | +20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +19.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.3% | +77.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UZD and PFLT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UZD is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFLT currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs UZD's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.72 | $10.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.28 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 66.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 984K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UZD and PFLT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, UZD offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs PFLT's 13.09%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
UZD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFLT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UZD vs PFLT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZD or PFLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZD or PFLT?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. wins at 0. 89x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069's 4. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZD or PFLT?
Over the past 5 years, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) delivered a total return of +19. 4%, compared to +4. 2% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFLT returned +72. 6% versus UZD's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZD or PFLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 79β — meaning PFLT is approximately 34% more volatile than UZD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UZD or PFLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(PFLT) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to -48. 6% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UZD or PFLT?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFLT leads at 39. 4% versus -30. 2% for UZD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFLT leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UZD or PFLT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069's 4. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UZD or PFLT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 13. 1% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT).
09Is UZD or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UZD: +11. 9%, PFLT: +72. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UZD and PFLT?
These companies operate in different sectors (UZD (Communication Services) and PFLT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.