Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UZE vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
UZE vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $83.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.5x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $1.47B |
UZE vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZE) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZE vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.65, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.72x
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 114.4% 10Y total return vs UZE's 1.0%
- PEG 3.77 vs UZE's 4.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UZE's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 27.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs UZE's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (66.4% vs 434.2%) | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -11.1% vs AMT's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs UZE's 3.8%, ROIC 6.9% vs -0.6% |
UZE vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UZE vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 5.7x UZE's $1.9B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UZE's 15.2%. On growth, AMT holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
UZE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, UZE trades at a 84% valuation discount to AMT's 33.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UZE offers better value at 1.11x vs AMT's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $83.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $127.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.47x | 33.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.52x | 27.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.11x | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.68x | 7.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 8.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.60x | 22.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for UZE. UZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs UZE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UZE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UZE five years ago would be worth $9,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,668 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, UZE leads with a -11.1% total return vs AMT's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UZE at 18.4% vs AMT's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +3.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +114.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UZE and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UZE's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UZE currently trades 81.6% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.35 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.29 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.6% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UZE and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, UZE offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AMT's 3.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UZE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
UZE vs AMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZE or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZE or AMT?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus American Tower Corporation at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 is actually cheaper at 20. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Tower Corporation wins at 3. 77x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 4. 18x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZE or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) delivered a total return of -3. 0%, compared to -13. 3% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMT returned +114. 4% versus UZE's +1. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZE or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 0. 65β — meaning UZE is approximately -1833% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UZE or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for American Tower Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMT leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UZE or AMT?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus 23. 8% for American Tower Corporation — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus -30. 2% for UZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UZE or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 77x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 4. 18x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for American Tower Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UZE or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).
09Is UZE or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, UZE: +1. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UZE and AMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (UZE (Communication Services) and AMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UZE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.