Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UZF vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
UZF vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $1.00B |
UZF vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 100 | 70.5 | -29.5% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZF vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 100.0%
- -4.1% 10Y total return vs LUMN's -35.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 0.72x
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -5.4%, EPS growth -30.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.8%
- -5.4% revenue growth vs UZF's -95.7%
- +100.0% vs UZF's -12.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.4% revenue growth vs UZF's -95.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs UZF's -12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC -0.6% vs -0.8% |
UZF vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UZF vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UZF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 6.3x UZF's $1.9B. UZF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, LUMN holds the edge at -8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LUMN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.38x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.17x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.51x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.59x | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UZF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UZF delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UZF five years ago would be worth $9,589 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,119 for LUMN. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs UZF's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs UZF's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.0% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
UZF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UZF is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UZF currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs LUMN's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.59 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.21 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
UZF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
UZF is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% |
UZF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LUMN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
UZF vs LUMN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZF or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lumen Technologies, Inc.
(LUMN) is the stronger pick with -5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UZF or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -28. 8% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UZF returned -4. 1% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UZF or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 356% more volatile than UZF relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UZF or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumen Technologies, Inc.
(LUMN) is pulling ahead at -5. 4% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUMN leads at -10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UZF or LUMN?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LUMN leads at -1. 5% versus -30. 2% for UZF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UZF or LUMN?
In this comparison, UZF (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. LUMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UZF or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 100. 0% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UZF: -4. 1%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UZF and LUMN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UZF is a small-cap deep-value stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UZF pays a dividend while LUMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.