Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UZF vs SBAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
UZF vs SBAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $23.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $2.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 63.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 47.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 29.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $15.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $432M |
UZF vs SBAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 100 | 70.5 | -29.5% |
| SBA Communications … (SBAC) | 100 | 73.3 | -26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZF vs SBAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZF is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.60, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.72x
- Lower P/E (20.2x vs 29.4x)
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBAC's 2.0%
SBAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 138.9% 10Y total return vs UZF's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UZF's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 29.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.7% margin vs UZF's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs UZF's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBAC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.1% vs UZF's -12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs UZF's 3.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -0.6% |
UZF vs SBAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UZF vs SBAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBAC and UZF operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and $1.9B in trailing revenue. SBAC is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UZF's 15.2%. On growth, SBAC holds the edge at +5.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +63.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +47.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +35.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -14.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UZF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, UZF trades at a 76% valuation discount to SBAC's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBAC offers better value at 0.19x vs UZF's 1.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $23.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $38.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.38x | 22.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.17x | 29.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | 0.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.51x | 8.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.59x | 21.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBAC scores 7/9 vs UZF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $14.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $432M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 3.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UZF and SBAC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UZF five years ago would be worth $9,589 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,120 for SBAC. Over the past 12 months, SBAC leads with a -7.1% total return vs UZF's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UZF at 17.8% vs SBAC's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.0% | -7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +138.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SBAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UZF's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBAC currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs UZF's 79.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.59 | $244.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.21 | $162.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UZF and SBAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, UZF offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SBAC's 2.04%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $230.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $4.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +2.1% |
SBAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UZF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UZF vs SBAC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZF or SBAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZF or SBAC?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus SBA Communications Corporation at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 is actually cheaper at 20. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SBA Communications Corporation wins at 0. 25x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 4. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZF or SBAC?
Over the past 5 years, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -18. 8% for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBAC returned +138. 9% versus UZF's -4. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZF or SBAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 0. 60β — meaning UZF is approximately 270% more volatile than SBAC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — UZF or SBAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to 41. 2% for SBA Communications Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBAC leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UZF or SBAC?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus 37. 4% for SBA Communications Corporation — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBAC leads at 48. 7% versus -30. 2% for UZF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBAC leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UZF or SBAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070's 4. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 29. 4x for SBA Communications Corporation — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UZF or SBAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 0% for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC).
09Is UZF or SBAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 0% yield, +138. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBAC: +138. 9%, UZF: -4. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UZF and SBAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (UZF (Communication Services) and SBAC (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UZF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBAC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.