Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VANI vs BRNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
VANI vs BRNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $72M | $27M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-52M |
| Total Debt | $19M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $70M |
VANI vs BRNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivani Medical, Inc. (VANI) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Barinthus Biotherap… (BRNS) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VANI vs BRNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VANI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- EPS growth 14.0%
- -11.5% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0%
- +18.6% vs BRNS's -32.3%
BRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.28
- -95.2% 10Y total return vs VANI's -98.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 7.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.5% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs VANI's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.6% vs BRNS's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -48.8% ROA vs VANI's -103.9%, ROIC -174.5% vs -94.0% |
VANI vs BRNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VANI vs BRNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRNS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VANI and BRNS operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$52M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | -$36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VANI and BRNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $27M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | -$32M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.81x | -0.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.78x | 0.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRNS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRNS delivers a -63.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-64 in annual profit, vs $-20 for VANI. BRNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VANI's 1.10x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.9% | -63.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.9% | -48.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -94.0% | -174.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.2% | -46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.10x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $961,000 | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1808.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VANI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VANI five years ago would be worth $727 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $495 for BRNS. Over the past 12 months, VANI leads with a +18.6% total return vs BRNS's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VANI at -3.3% vs BRNS's -34.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | -71.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -95.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -95.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | -34.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VANI and BRNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRNS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VANI's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VANI currently trades 63.0% from its 52-week high vs BRNS's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $2.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.92 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.0% | +22.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 235K | 25K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BRNS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VANI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VANI vs BRNS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VANI or BRNS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Vivani Medical, Inc.
(VANI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VANI or BRNS?
Over the past 5 years, Vivani Medical, Inc.
(VANI) delivered a total return of -92. 7%, compared to -95. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRNS returned -95. 2% versus VANI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VANI or BRNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Vivani Medical, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning VANI is approximately 8% more volatile than BRNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 110% for Vivani Medical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VANI or BRNS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vivani Medical, Inc.
grew EPS 14. 0% year-over-year, compared to -5. 8% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VANI or BRNS?
Vivani Medical, Inc.
(VANI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VANI leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for BRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VANI leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VANI or BRNS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VANI or BRNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRNS: -95. 2%, VANI: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VANI and BRNS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.