Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $280M | $5.06B | $1.62B | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $7M | $4M | $68M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $-136M | $-569M | $-413M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 74.8% | — | -41.7% | -25.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -22.2% | -134.1% | -6.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | 80.9x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $98M | $78M | $395M | $93M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $47M | $355M | $155M | $147M |
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vericel Corporation (VCEL) | 100 | 244.3 | +144.3% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.47
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.9%
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 272.0%
- 7.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
FATE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +143.0% vs VCEL's -13.2%
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.93, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
- Beta 1.93, current ratio 13.32x
NTLA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 16.9% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.47 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.0% vs VCEL's -13.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VCEL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FATE leads 0 • CRSP leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCEL and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $292M and $0 in trailing revenue. VCEL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $7M | $4M | $68M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | -$148M | -$535M | -$431M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | -$136M | -$569M | -$413M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | -$88M | -$401M | -$396M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.8% | — | -41.7% | -25.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -22.2% | -134.1% | -6.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | -20.5% | -138.6% | -6.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | -13.2% | -97.8% | -5.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | -26.4% | +68.6% | +78.8% | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.8% | +38.6% | +19.0% | +34.6% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VCEL and FATE and CRSP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $280M | $5.1B | $1.6B | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $312M | $5.1B | $1.6B | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 109.78x | -2.11x | -8.10x | -3.60x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.85x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.78x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 79.78x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.48x | 42.18x | 1440.41x | 23.93x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.16x | 1.39x | 2.45x | 2.21x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.30x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VCEL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VCEL delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCEL scores 8/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | -65.8% | -30.9% | -56.6% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -42.7% | -24.5% | -45.2% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | -36.5% | -22.3% | -44.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -43.1% | -26.6% | -48.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.38x | 0.21x | 0.14x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $31M | $40M | -$62M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $47M | $355M | $155M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $78M | $395M | $93M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 91.80x | — | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VCEL five years ago would be worth $6,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs VCEL's -13.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCEL at 2.1% vs EDIT's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | +145.5% | -2.5% | +48.9% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.2% | +143.0% | +53.1% | +88.1% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | -55.4% | -6.3% | -68.3% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.3% | -96.8% | -51.3% | -79.8% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1205.9% | +40.5% | +272.0% | -42.9% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -23.6% | -2.2% | -31.8% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VCEL and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VCEL is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 2.17x | 1.93x | 2.37x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.97 | $2.46 | $78.48 | $28.25 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.95 | $0.91 | $33.50 | $6.83 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +98.6% | +66.8% | +48.5% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 81.0 | 55.5 | 50.4 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 626K | 1.9M | 2.0M | 5.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCEL as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 20.2% for CRSP (target: $63).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $39.50 | $63.00 | $20.88 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 31 | 38 | 39 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VCEL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
VCEL vs FATE vs CRSP vs NTLA vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Vericel Corporation (VCEL) offers the better valuation at 109. 8x trailing P/E (80. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vericel Corporation (VCEL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) delivered a total return of -33.
3%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCEL returned +1206% versus EDIT's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
47β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 71% more volatile than VCEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 66% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vericel Corporation grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT?
Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VCEL leads at 4. 0% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VCEL or FATE or CRSP or NTLA or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1206% 10Y return).
Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VCEL: +1206%, EDIT: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VCEL and FATE and CRSP and NTLA and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.