Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $112.69B | $16.32B | $84.08B | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $25.12B | $8.41B | $20.07B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $3.25B | $761M | $2.89B | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 74.8% | 63.5% | 70.0% | 69.0% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 22.4% | 15.6% | 19.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 80.9x | 19.6x | 9.8x | 16.7x | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $98M | $14.86B | $7.52B | $12.42B | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $4.01B | $592M | $2.04B | $1.96B |
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vericel Corporation (VCEL) | 100 | 244.3 | +144.3% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
| Boston Scientific C… (BSX) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.9%
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 187.1% 10Y total return vs VCEL's 12.1%
- PEG 1.32 vs VCEL's 2.05
- 1.1% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 6.9% ROA vs ZBH's 3.3%, ROIC 11.4% vs 5.4%
ZBH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.65, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.98x
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 17.2x)
BSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.62x
- 19.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
- 14.4% margin vs VCEL's 7.3%
- Beta 0.34 vs VCEL's 1.47
HOLX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.1% vs BSX's -46.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs VCEL's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs VCEL's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs BSX's -46.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs ZBH's 3.3%, ROIC 11.4% vs 5.4% |
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZBH leads in 1 of 6 categories
VCEL leads 1 • BSX leads 1 • SYK leads 0 • HOLX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VCEL and SYK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 86.0x VCEL's $292M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VCEL's 7.3%. On growth, VCEL holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $25.1B | $8.4B | $20.1B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $6.3B | $2.3B | $4.7B | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $3.2B | $761M | $2.9B | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $4.3B | $1.8B | $3.6B | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.8% | +63.5% | +70.0% | +69.0% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +22.4% | +15.6% | +19.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +12.9% | +9.1% | +14.4% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +17.1% | +21.8% | +18.1% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +11.4% | +9.3% | +15.9% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.8% | +56.0% | +34.1% | +18.5% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ZBH leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, ZBH trades at a 79% valuation discount to VCEL's 109.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs VCEL's 2.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $112.7B | $16.3B | $84.1B | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $123.5B | $23.3B | $94.5B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 109.78x | 35.03x | 23.48x | 29.16x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.85x | 19.62x | 9.83x | 16.75x | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.78x | 2.36x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 79.78x | 20.31x | 9.47x | 25.30x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.48x | 4.49x | 1.98x | 4.19x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.16x | 5.02x | 1.30x | 3.46x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.30x | 26.31x | 11.09x | 22.99x | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VCEL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for ZBH. VCEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCEL scores 8/9 vs ZBH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +15.0% | +5.8% | +12.4% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +6.9% | +3.3% | +6.9% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +11.4% | +5.4% | +8.8% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +13.0% | +6.9% | +11.1% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.66x | 0.59x | 0.51x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $10.8B | $6.9B | $10.4B | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $4.0B | $592M | $2.0B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $14.9B | $7.5B | $12.4B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 91.80x | 6.72x | 4.08x | 11.03x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,268 for ZBH. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs BSX's -46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 2.1% vs ZBH's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | -15.2% | -7.1% | -40.3% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.2% | -22.5% | -10.4% | -46.0% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +5.5% | -37.2% | +6.5% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.3% | +21.5% | -47.3% | +31.2% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1205.9% | +187.1% | -17.8% | +155.5% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +1.8% | -14.4% | +2.1% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSX and HOLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VCEL's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BSX's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.55x | 0.65x | 0.34x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.97 | $404.87 | $108.29 | $109.50 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.95 | $289.91 | $79.83 | $54.98 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +72.7% | +77.0% | +51.7% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 24.3 | 34.3 | 33.2 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 626K | 2.1M | 2.2M | 15.5M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SYK and ZBH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCEL as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold", BSX as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.4% upside for BSX (target: $91) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). For income investors, ZBH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.15% vs SYK's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $403.69 | $97.90 | $91.33 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 50 | 42 | 43 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 34 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.36 | $0.96 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
ZBH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). VCEL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
VCEL vs SYK vs ZBH vs BSX vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger pick with 19.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vericel Corporation (VCEL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Vericel Corporation at 109. 8x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Vericel Corporation's 2. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.
2%, compared to -47. 3% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCEL returned +1206% versus ZBH's -17. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus Vericel Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning VCEL is approximately 328% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 66% for Stryker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is pulling ahead at 19.
9% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vericel Corporation grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VCEL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus 6. 0% for Vericel Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus 4. 0% for VCEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VCEL leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Vericel Corporation's 2. 05x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 80. 9x for Vericel Corporation — 71. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSX: 61. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX?
In this comparison, ZBH (1.
1% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. VCEL, BSX, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VCEL or SYK or ZBH or BSX or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, VCEL: +1206%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VCEL and SYK and ZBH and BSX and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, ZBH pay a dividend while VCEL, BSX, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.