VCIC
Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$242M
5Y Perf.+10.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VCIC vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
Asset Management
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.-8.5%
VCIC vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VCIC | CSWC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $242M | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 141.4x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $43M |
VCIC vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VCIC
CSWC
| Stock | Oct 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vine Hill Capital I… (VCIC) | 100 | 110.3 | +10.3% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCIC vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CSWC leads in 5 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VCIC
Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
The Financial Play
In this particular matchup, VCIC is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: financial services exposure
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
The Banking Pick
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs VCIC's 10.4%
- NIM 7.0% vs VCIC's 1.4%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 141.4x)
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | CSWC | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 141.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | CSWC | 43.1% margin vs VCIC's 1.4% |
| Dividends | CSWC | 10.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CSWC | +34.0% vs VCIC's +6.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CSWC | 4.8% ROA vs VCIC's 2.7% |
VCIC vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCSWCLAGGINGVCIC
VCICVine Hill Capital Inv…
0leads
CSWCCapital Southwest Cor…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VCICMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CSWC1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CSWC2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CSWC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC and VCIC operate at a comparable scale, with $164M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$947,000 | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.0% | +113.3% |
CSWC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, CSWC trades at a 88% valuation discount to VCIC's 141.4x P/E.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $242M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 141.39x | 16.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VCIC and CSWC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for VCIC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCIC scores 3/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.91x |
Evenly matched — VCIC and CSWC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,044 for VCIC. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.0% total return vs VCIC's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs VCIC's 3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +234.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +20.7% |
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VCIC and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VCIC is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs VCIC's 80.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.36x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.70 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.32 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 115K | 664K |
Evenly matched — VCIC and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CSWC is the only dividend payer here at 10.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | VCICVine Hill Capital… | CSWCCapital Southwest… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CSWC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallCapital Southwest Corporati… (CSWC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VCIC vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCIC or CSWC a better buy right now?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the better valuation at 16.
3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCIC or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. at 141. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCIC or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to +10. 4% for Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. (VCIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +233. 4% versus VCIC's +10. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCIC or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
(VCIC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 36β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 81β — meaning CSWC is approximately -325% more volatile than VCIC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — VCIC or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus 0. 0% for VCIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSWC leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VCIC or CSWC?
In this comparison, CSWC (10.
2% yield) pays a dividend. VCIC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is VCIC or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
(VCIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 36)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VCIC: +10. 4%, CSWC: +233. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VCIC and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CSWC pays a dividend while VCIC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(VCIC: 141.4x · CSWC: 16.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.