Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.57B | $2.22B | $5.53B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M | $0.00 | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-369M | $-259M | $-464M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% | — | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -191.6% | — | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $77M | $2M | $98K | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $355M | $29M | $714M | $222M |
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Therapeutics, … (VERA) | 100 | 208.0 | +108.0% |
| Celldex Therapeutic… (CLDX) | 100 | 119.2 | +19.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VERA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.35
- 212.0% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 13.64x
- Beta 1.35, current ratio 13.64x
CLDX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 3.2% margin vs CLDX's -172.5%
RCUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.3%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- -4.3% revenue growth vs VERA's -111.5%
- +209.6% vs VERA's +58.6%
- -35.3% ROA vs VERA's -60.2%, ROIC -64.1% vs -54.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.3% revenue growth vs VERA's -111.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs CLDX's -172.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs VERA's +58.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.3% ROA vs VERA's -60.2%, ROIC -64.1% vs -54.6% |
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCUS leads in 1 of 6 categories
VERA leads 1 • CLDX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. RCUS is the more profitable business, keeping -156.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLDX's -172.5%. On growth, RCUS holds the edge at -39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M | $0 | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$382M | -$284M | -$487M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$369M | -$259M | -$464M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$294M | -$213M | -$423M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% | — | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -191.6% | — | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -172.5% | — | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -142.2% | — | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -93.6% | — | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.6% | -73.2% | +19.7% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VERA and IMVT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $2.2B | $5.5B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $2.2B | $4.8B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.70x | -8.54x | -9.97x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1477.19x | — | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.81x | 4.20x | 5.83x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CLDX and IMVT and RCUS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLDX delivers a -41.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-42 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VERA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLDX scores 3/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.9% | -41.7% | -47.1% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -38.9% | -44.1% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.6% | -35.2% | — | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | -44.7% | -66.1% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$277M | -$27M | -$714M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $355M | $29M | $714M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $2M | $98,000 | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.22x | — | — | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VERA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VERA five years ago would be worth $31,200 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,143 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs VERA's +58.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VERA at 68.1% vs CLDX's -0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.2% | +23.4% | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.6% | +76.2% | +96.1% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.6% | -0.1% | +40.9% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.0% | +22.0% | +62.4% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.0% | -43.3% | +173.6% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | -0.0% | +12.1% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VERA and CLDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VERA is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLDX currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs VERA's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.73x | 1.37x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.05 | $35.79 | $30.09 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.76 | $17.85 | $13.36 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +93.1% | +90.5% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 60.7 | 60.2 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 985K | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VERA as "Buy", CLDX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 116.3% upside for VERA (target: $78) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.60 | $45.00 | $45.50 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 23 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCUS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). VERA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
VERA vs CLDX vs IMVT vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the stronger pick with -4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 6% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX). Analysts rate Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) delivered a total return of +212. 0%, compared to -18. 6% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VERA returned +212. 0% versus CLDX's -43. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 45% more volatile than VERA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is pulling ahead at -4. 3% versus -78. 6% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcus Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS -4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 5% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS?
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -172. 5% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VERA leads at 0. 0% versus -191. 6% for CLDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLDX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VERA or CLDX or IMVT or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+212. 0% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VERA: +212. 0%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VERA and CLDX and IMVT and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.