Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VERA vs VKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
VERA vs VKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.57B | $3.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-369M | $-472M |
| Total Debt | $77M | $137K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $355M | $166M |
VERA vs VKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Therapeutics, … (VERA) | 100 | 208.0 | +108.0% |
| Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX) | 100 | 602.7 | +502.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VERA vs VKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VERA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.35
- EPS growth -69.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 13.64x
VKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 25.8% 10Y total return vs VERA's 212.0%
- 4.7% margin vs VERA's 2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -111.5% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs VERA's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs VKTX's 1.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.6% vs VKTX's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -60.2% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC -54.6% vs -44.4% |
VERA vs VKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VERA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VERA and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$382M | -$502M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$369M | -$472M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$294M | -$340M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.6% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VERA and VKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.70x | -9.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.81x | 5.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VKTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VKTX delivers a -71.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-71 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VERA. VKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VERA's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VKTX scores 2/9 vs VERA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.9% | -71.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -65.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.6% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | -51.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$277M | -$166M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $355M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $137,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.22x | -15687.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VERA and VKTX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $53,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $31,200 for VERA. Over the past 12 months, VERA leads with a +58.6% total return vs VKTX's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VERA at 68.1% vs VKTX's 11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.2% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.6% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.6% | +38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.0% | +435.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.0% | +2576.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VERA and VKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VERA is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VKTX's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VKTX currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs VERA's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.05 | $43.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.76 | $22.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VERA as "Buy" and VKTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 219.0% upside for VKTX (target: $101) vs 116.3% for VERA (target: $78).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.60 | $100.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VERA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). VKTX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
VERA vs VKTX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VERA or VKTX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VERA or VKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) delivered a total return of +435. 3%, compared to +212. 0% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc. (VERA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +25. 8% versus VERA's +212. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VERA or VKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Viking Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning VKTX is approximately 19% more volatile than VERA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VERA or VKTX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS -69. 5% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Viking Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VERA or VKTX?
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Viking Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VERA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for VKTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VERA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VERA or VKTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is VERA or VKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
(VERA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+212. 0% 10Y return). Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VERA: +212. 0%, VKTX: +25. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VERA and VKTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.