VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+150.0%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisVET
XOM
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VET vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$623.01B
5Y Perf.+228.7%
VET vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  VET |  XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $623.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-814M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.30B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $10.68B |
VET vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VET
XOM
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermilion Energy In… (VET) | 100 | 250.0 | +150.0% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 328.7 | +228.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VET vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Vermilion Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇XOM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
The Income Pick
VET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 4.1%
- Beta -0.18, yield 4.1%, current ratio 0.84x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 13.4x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 101.3% 10Y total return vs VET's -39.7%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.37, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs VET's -15.0% |
| Value |  VET | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 13.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOM | 8.9% margin vs VET's -44.9% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 58.6%) |
| Dividends | VET | 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VET | +45.6% vs XOM's +37.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs VET's -13.8%, ROIC 8.6% vs 3.5% |
VET vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
VET vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLXOMLAGGINGVET
VETVermilion Energy Inc.
1leads
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
VET6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XOM6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XOM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
XOM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VET and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 178.6x VET's $1.8B. XOM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VET's -44.9%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$814M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $301M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.4% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.9% | -11.0% |
Evenly matched — VET and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
VET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VET's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $623.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $655.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.68x | 21.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.20x | 13.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.92x | 10.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.32x | 26.39x |
VET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-34 for VET. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VET's 0.59x.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.53x | 69.44x |
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,136 for VET. Over the past 12 months, VET leads with a +45.6% total return vs XOM's +37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 14.3% vs VET's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | +49.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | +167.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +101.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | +14.3% |
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VET's -0.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs VET's 75.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | -0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.82 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $105.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 13.9M |
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VET and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VET as "Hold" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for XOM (target: $170) vs -3.7% for VET (target: $11). For income investors, VET offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs XOM's 2.72%.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.74 | $170.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +3.3% |
Evenly matched — VET and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
XOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallExxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VET vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VET or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VET or XOM?
On forward P/E, Vermilion Energy Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VET or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +167.
3%, compared to +41. 4% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +101. 3% versus VET's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VET or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
37β versus Vermilion Energy Inc. 's -0. 18β — meaning VET is approximately -51% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 59% for Vermilion Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VET or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1313. 3% for Vermilion Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VET or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -37. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus 9. 5% for VET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VET or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 15. 7% to $170. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — VET or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is VET or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
37), 2. 7% yield, +101. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +101. 3%, VET: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VET and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.