VFC
V.F. Corporation
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$7.45B
5Y Perf.-66.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VFC vs GIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$9.09B
5Y Perf.+327.2%
VFC vs GIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | VFC | GIL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $7.45B | $9.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.58B | $3.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $223M | $400M |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 19.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.1x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.37B | $4.87B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $284M |
VFC vs GIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VFC
GIL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| V.F. Corporation (VFC) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Gildan Activewear I… (GIL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VFC vs GIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GIL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. V.F. Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VFC
V.F. Corporation
The Income Pick
VFC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 1.9% yield, vs GIL's 1.5%
- +52.7% vs GIL's +29.1%
Best for: dividends and momentum
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
The Income Pick
GIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 117.4% 10Y total return vs VFC's -45.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GIL | 12.5% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1% |
| Value | GIL | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 23.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | GIL | 11.0% margin vs VFC's 2.3% |
| Stability / Safety | GIL | Beta 1.22 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage |
| Dividends | VFC | 1.9% yield, vs GIL's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VFC | +52.7% vs GIL's +29.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GIL | 7.1% ROA vs VFC's 2.1%, ROIC 9.8% vs 2.7% |
VFC vs GIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
VFC vs GIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGILLAGGINGVFC
VFCV.F. Corporation
0leads
GILGildan Activewear Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VFCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GIL4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GIL4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GIL8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GIL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 2.6x GIL's $3.6B. GIL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VFC's 2.3%. On growth, GIL holds the edge at +33.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.6B | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $748M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $223M | $400M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$666M | $483M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.8% | +31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +19.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.5% | +33.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.7% | -58.1% |
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GIL's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VFC's 22.0x.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.5B | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.4B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.90x | 22.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.08x | 13.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.05x | 15.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.03x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.97x | 19.05x |
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIL delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $13 for VFC. GIL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VFC's 3.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VFC scores 7/9 vs GIL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.61x | 1.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.9B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $284M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.4B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.79x | 4.76x |
GIL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIL five years ago would be worth $17,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,709 for VFC. Over the past 12 months, VFC leads with a +52.7% total return vs GIL's +29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIL at 27.3% vs VFC's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.5% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.7% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.4% | +106.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +72.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.4% | +117.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | +27.3% |
GIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VFC and GIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIL is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VFC's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VFC currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs GIL's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.16 | $73.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.06 | $46.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.0% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 1.3M |
Evenly matched — VFC and GIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VFC and GIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VFC as "Hold" and GIL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for GIL (target: $82) vs 6.3% for VFC (target: $20). For income investors, VFC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.87% vs GIL's 1.51%.
| Metric | VFCV.F. Corporation | GILGildan Activewear… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.27 | $82.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 58 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.4% |
Evenly matched — VFC and GIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GIL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallGildan Activewear Inc. (GIL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VFC vs GIL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VFC or GIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VFC or GIL?
On forward P/E, Gildan Activewear Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VFC or GIL?
Over the past 5 years, Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) delivered a total return of +72. 6%, compared to -72. 9% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIL returned +117. 4% versus VFC's -45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VFC or GIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus V. F. Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning VFC is approximately 93% more volatile than GIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 137% versus 4% for V. F. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VFC or GIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: V. F. Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 7% for Gildan Activewear Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VFC or GIL?
Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 0% net margin versus -2. 0% for V. F. Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIL leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 2% for VFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VFC leads at 53. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VFC or GIL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for V. F. Corporation — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GIL: 38. 3% to $82. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — VFC or GIL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
V. F. Corporation (VFC) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 5% for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL).
09Is VFC or GIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gildan Activewear Inc.
(GIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 5% yield, +117. 4% 10Y return). V. F. Corporation (VFC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIL: +117. 4%, VFC: -45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VFC and GIL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(VFC: 1.5% · GIL: 33.2%)Net Margin>
%
(VFC: 2.3% · GIL: 11.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.